“…For example, Painter and Philo (1995) argue that it is through the demarcation of 'insiders' and 'outsiders' that liberal citizenship asserts its right to rule (see also Isin, 2002;Isin & Turner, 2007). One of the key messages of this work has been that forms of exclusion take many forms, from the securitisation of borders and tightening of immigration controls (Leitner & Strunk, 2014;Sparke, 2006), to socially and culturally inscribed mechanisms of exclusion based on gender (Goldring, 2001), class (Pykett, 2009), sexuality (Binnie & Valentine, 1999;Hubbard, 2013), age (Jeffrey, 2010), disability (Valentine & Skelton, 2007), race (Kofman, 1995) or intersections of these lines of identity (Preston, Kobayashi, & Man, 2006). The co-presence of so many strands of potential exclusion has led scholars to rely upon a distinction between de jure and de facto citizenship to highlight the distinction between the conferment of citizenship rights and the possibility of practicing or accessing such rights (see, for example, Valentine & Skelton, 2007).…”