2000
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/18/1/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacetime as a Feynman diagram: the connection formulation

Abstract: Spin foam models are the path integral counterparts to loop quantized canonical theories. In the last few years several spin foam models of gravity have been proposed, most of which live on finite simplicial lattice spacetime. The lattice truncates the presumably infinite set of gravitational degrees of freedom down to a finite set. Models that can accomodate an infinite set of degrees of freedom and that are independent of any background simplicial structure, or indeed any a priori spacetime topology, can be … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
268
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
268
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, given a spin foam model we can reconstruct a GFT via (12,13). This establishes the equivalence or duality between spin foam models and GFT, which was first proven in [29]. One can now check that the example (7) gives in dimension 3 the Ponzano-Regge model and in higher dimensions the discretization of topological BF .…”
Section: Fig 2: Triangulation Generated By Feynman Diagramssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Conversely, given a spin foam model we can reconstruct a GFT via (12,13). This establishes the equivalence or duality between spin foam models and GFT, which was first proven in [29]. One can now check that the example (7) gives in dimension 3 the Ponzano-Regge model and in higher dimensions the discretization of topological BF .…”
Section: Fig 2: Triangulation Generated By Feynman Diagramssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…As a consequence of this, 29) and so the states |ξ are squeezed states if the operatorsφ(g I ) −ξ g I and their Hermitian conjugates satisfy the (suitably gauge-invariant) algebra of creation and annihilation operators, 30) which will in general only be true for specific choices of ξ. Evaluating the commutator we find that…”
Section: Gft Condensates Vs Coherent and Squeezed Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric content of this condition is revealed by taking the simplicity constraints into account as well. First of all, note that the presence of this delta function reduces the gauge invariance of the Feynman amplitude Z from the invariance under B ef → GB ef G −1 , H f →ḠH fḠ −1 for arbitrary G,Ḡ 8 , that could be deduced from the action term alone and the simplicity constraints (we will see that also the other terms μ and S c would allow for this large D Oriti symmetry) to the smaller B ef → GB ef G −1 , H f → GH f G −1 for the same group element G. This is indeed the symmetry of BF theory (see, for example, [24,25]). Consider now the simplicity constraints with a negative sign B ef = (b ef , −n e b ef n −1 e ) implying that B ef is an area bivector A f .…”
Section: Feynman Amplitudes: Discrete Gravity Path Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%