1998
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/8.3.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacing of cytochrome oxidase blobs in visual cortex of normal and strabismic monkeys

Abstract: Some models of visual cortical development are based on the assumption that the tangential organization of V1 is not determined prior to visual experience. In these models, correlated binocular activity is a key element in the formation of visual cortical columns, and when the degree of interocular correlation is reduced the models predict an increase in column spacing. To examine this prediction we measured the spacing of columns, as defined by cytochrome oxidase (CO) blobs, in the visual cortex of monkeys wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate an average distance between iso-orientation columns, activation foci were determined, and then the average distance of neighboring foci was determined by the nearest-neighbor spatial analysis technique (Murphy et al, 1998) within the range of interpeak distances between 313 m and 2 mm. The CNR of the orientation-selective signal was calculated by dividing the signal magnitude at 0.0125 Hz in the active ROI by that in the noise ROI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate an average distance between iso-orientation columns, activation foci were determined, and then the average distance of neighboring foci was determined by the nearest-neighbor spatial analysis technique (Murphy et al, 1998) within the range of interpeak distances between 313 m and 2 mm. The CNR of the orientation-selective signal was calculated by dividing the signal magnitude at 0.0125 Hz in the active ROI by that in the noise ROI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the effect of monocular or binocular deprivation during cortical maturation can be so severe that it leads to blindness (Kalloniatis & Harwerth, 1993). Monocular deprivation results in dramatic loss of influence of the deprived eye on cells in V1 both anatomically and physiologically (Murphy et al 1998;Kiorpes, 2006). The main physiological result is the loss of cortical binocularity, whereas anatomically the normal-eye input invades the region of deprived-eye input.…”
Section: Perturbations Of Normal Maturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such specific patterning is not as surprising as it may seem, however, because the primate visual cortex is developmentally distinct. Specialization of magnocellular and parvocellular subsystems is apparent early and is independent of patterned activity (Kuljis and Rakic, 1990;Dehay et al, 1991;Rakic, 1991;Rakic et al, 1991;Rakic and Lidow, 1995;Bourgeois and Rakic, 1996;Meissirel et al, 1997;Snider et al, 1999), and other aspects of the visual cortex's functional organization are also established early and not modifiable by experience (Dehay and Kennedy, 1988;Kennedy and Dehay, 1993;Rakic and Lidow, 1995;Bourgeois and Rakic, 1996;Godecke and Bonhoeffer, 1996;Horton and Hocking, 1996;Murphy et al, 1998). Moreover, the superior colliculus, the midbrain visual center, develops normally in the absence of mature patterns of visual activity: receptive field properties develop properly in newborn monkeys (Wallace et al, 1997) and corticocollicular projections are normal in anophthalmic mice (Khachab and Bruce, 1999).…”
Section: Areal Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%