2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spallation-dominated propagation of heavy cosmic rays and the Local Interstellar Medium (LISM)

Abstract: Abstract. Measurements of ultra-heavy nuclei at GeV/n energies in the galactic cosmic radiation address the question of their sources (nucleosynthetic s-and r-processes). As such, the determination of CR source abundances is a promising way to discriminate between existing nucleosynthesis models. For primary species (nuclei present and accelerated at the source), it is generally assumed that the relative propagated abundances, if they are close in mass, are not too different from their relative source abundanc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations ) of cosmic ray elemental enrichment ratios of the ThU/Pt group from supernovae also suggests a similar ejecta mixing ratio F EJ close to 20% for the products of explosive r-process supernova nucleosynthesis. These calculations based on Kratz et al (1993) of the radioactive Actinide/Pt group abundance ratio predicted a cosmic ray source value of 0.027±0.005, which is quite consistent with the latest balloon measurements (Combet et al 2005;Donnelly et al 2012) of ~0.032.…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Source Mixingsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculations ) of cosmic ray elemental enrichment ratios of the ThU/Pt group from supernovae also suggests a similar ejecta mixing ratio F EJ close to 20% for the products of explosive r-process supernova nucleosynthesis. These calculations based on Kratz et al (1993) of the radioactive Actinide/Pt group abundance ratio predicted a cosmic ray source value of 0.027±0.005, which is quite consistent with the latest balloon measurements (Combet et al 2005;Donnelly et al 2012) of ~0.032.…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Source Mixingsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, comparisons of cosmic ray elemental abundance ratios measurements (Combet et al 2005;Donnelly et al 2012) of the ThU/Pt group with supernova r-process nucleosynthetic calculations ) also suggest a similar ~20% ejecta mixing ratio F EJ for such products of explosive r-process supernovae. The possibility of determining the relative contributions of CCSN s-and r-process yields can also be seen from the (Z/H) GCRS/SMGI outliers above (Z > 30) that appear to result from the contributions of r-process elements to the cosmic rays from CCSNe in addition to that calculated by (Woosley & Heger 2007) solely for the s-process.…”
Section: Ccsn R-processmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Combet et al (2005) conclude that the cosmic ray actinides were accelerated within 150 pc of us, vs. 1.25 kpc for Li, Be, and B. Higdon & Lingenfelter (2005) put most of the acceleration of the heavier nuclei in superbubbles, also close to us; and Derbina et al (2005) draw attention to the rapid change in composition, from a mean mass of five amu 5 at eV 12 15…”
Section: Godzilla Particlesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…How much p- [56,57], r-, and s-processes [58,59] contribute to the various UHCRs, and which astrophysical sites are involved remain debated. Moreover, the abundance of UHCRs slightly differs from the Solar system ones, and these differences are likely to be related to specific acceleration (e.g., [60]) or transport processes (e.g., [61]).…”
Section: Very Heavy and Ultra-heavy Crsmentioning
confidence: 99%