“…As seen in Table , optimum P L and P R values were ( P L = 1, P R = 7), ( P L = 6, P R = 2) and ( P L = 3, P R = 5) for the TREC, the Spamassasian, and the Ling‐Spam corpus data sets, respectively, while P = 8 . The obtained spam recall (95.2%, 93.2%, and 92.4% for three corpuses), which is an indication of filter effectiveness , and spam precision (95.2%, 93.3%, and 92.5%), which is an indication of filter safety , rates are also acceptable. As a summary, the higher the recall, the fewer spam messages pass, and the higher the precision, the less non‐spam messages blocked.…”