1996
DOI: 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00106-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Span of apprehension deficits in older outpatients with schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In numerous studies (for a review, see Beatty, 1982), increased task processing load (e.g., perceptual discriminability, sentence syntax complexity, number of arithmetic multiplicands) reliably evoked greater pupillary dilation responses, regardless of the cognitive domain tapped by different tasks (e.g., visual detection, language, memory, reasoning). For example, pupillary responses recorded during digit span recall tasks systematically increased in normal individuals after each additional to-berecalled digit was presented and then returned to resting baseline size after the digits were recalled (Granholm et al, 1996b;Peavler, 1974). Larger pupillary responses reflected greater allocation of available resources in these studies, and pupillary responses no longer increased when resource pools were depleted (e.g., when digit spans exceeded available working memory resources; Granholm et al, 1996b;Peavler, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In numerous studies (for a review, see Beatty, 1982), increased task processing load (e.g., perceptual discriminability, sentence syntax complexity, number of arithmetic multiplicands) reliably evoked greater pupillary dilation responses, regardless of the cognitive domain tapped by different tasks (e.g., visual detection, language, memory, reasoning). For example, pupillary responses recorded during digit span recall tasks systematically increased in normal individuals after each additional to-berecalled digit was presented and then returned to resting baseline size after the digits were recalled (Granholm et al, 1996b;Peavler, 1974). Larger pupillary responses reflected greater allocation of available resources in these studies, and pupillary responses no longer increased when resource pools were depleted (e.g., when digit spans exceeded available working memory resources; Granholm et al, 1996b;Peavler, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, pupillary responses recorded during digit span recall tasks systematically increased in normal individuals after each additional to-berecalled digit was presented and then returned to resting baseline size after the digits were recalled (Granholm et al, 1996b;Peavler, 1974). Larger pupillary responses reflected greater allocation of available resources in these studies, and pupillary responses no longer increased when resource pools were depleted (e.g., when digit spans exceeded available working memory resources; Granholm et al, 1996b;Peavler, 1974). The degree of pupillary dilation observed during cognitive tasks is directly proportional to the processing demands that task places on the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…T\venty-four schizophrenia patients and 32 normal comparison participants took part in the study. The span of apprehension task performance of 11 of the patients included in the present study was also examined and reported in Granholm, Asarnow, Verney, Nelson, and Jeste (1996). The patients with schizophrenia were recruited from inpatient and outpatient treatment settings of the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and from the Clinical Research Center for Late-Life Psychosis and Antipsychotics at the University of California, San Diego.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%