2007
DOI: 10.3201/eid1304.060615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spanish Influenza in Japanese Armed Forces, 1918–1920

Abstract: Medical records of Japanese army hospitals show high death rates during the first influenza pandemic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense over-crowded places would have been ideal for a susceptible person to be exposed to very high infectious doses of influenza A virus. In 1918 the army camps fit the model by being characterised by a high number of contacts between people and by a high case-fatality rate, sometimes 5 to 8 times higher than the case-fatality rate among civilian communities [23], [24]. This difference in influenza-like illness mortality is sometimes associated to poor conditions in military base hospitals [23] or to a lower lung capacity of soldiers due to the inhalation of gases during the war [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense over-crowded places would have been ideal for a susceptible person to be exposed to very high infectious doses of influenza A virus. In 1918 the army camps fit the model by being characterised by a high number of contacts between people and by a high case-fatality rate, sometimes 5 to 8 times higher than the case-fatality rate among civilian communities [23], [24]. This difference in influenza-like illness mortality is sometimes associated to poor conditions in military base hospitals [23] or to a lower lung capacity of soldiers due to the inhalation of gases during the war [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1918 the army camps fit the model by being characterised by a high number of contacts between people and by a high case-fatality rate, sometimes 5 to 8 times higher than the case-fatality rate among civilian communities [23], [24]. This difference in influenza-like illness mortality is sometimes associated to poor conditions in military base hospitals [23] or to a lower lung capacity of soldiers due to the inhalation of gases during the war [20]. However, of note, many of these reports were from training army camps [24] where soldiers had health-care conditions similar to those offered to civilian communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysed by year, almost 300 000 excess deaths were attributable to the October 1918–May 1919 influenza season (rate 0.54%), and 182 000 deaths to the December 1919–May 1920 season (rate 0.33%). Previous studies gave lower burden estimates for this pandemic in Japan, ranging from 257 000 to 390 000 deaths [1, 3, 13, 17]; however, two major limitations make these early estimates unreliable. First, these estimates were limited to the first pandemic season, thereby excluding all pandemic-related deaths occurring in the second pandemic season, December 1919–May 1920.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1918, Japan was an emerging economic force, reaping the benefits of governmental reforms and integration of industrial technology. Only three studies discuss the 1918–1920 pandemic in Japan, focusing on a primarily qualitative [16, 17] and clinical [13] description, and limited to a single winter season, 1918–1919. Here we compile historical vital statistics from Japan and describe the age and geographical mortality patterns associated with the successive waves of the influenza pandemic during 1918–1920.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously described the clinical features of Spanish influenza among patients who were hospitalized at several study sites ( 2 ). Recently, additional records of patients affected by the second wave of disease during 1919–1920 were discovered, and these patients were the subjects of this study.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%