2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3667601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spanish Regions in Global Value Chains: How Important? How Different?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Lalanne (2023), the percentage of income induced by international trade relations is around 26% in Europe and 20.4% in East and South East Asia. Other studies reach similar results employing alternative indexes (Stöllinger et al, 2018;Miroudot and Nordström, 2020;Xiao et al, 2020). 1 Within South America, the countries that are part of the two most important trade blocs, Mercosur and the Pacific Alliance (PA from now on), show different trajectories, with the latter being the most integrated sub-region.…”
Section: General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…According to Lalanne (2023), the percentage of income induced by international trade relations is around 26% in Europe and 20.4% in East and South East Asia. Other studies reach similar results employing alternative indexes (Stöllinger et al, 2018;Miroudot and Nordström, 2020;Xiao et al, 2020). 1 Within South America, the countries that are part of the two most important trade blocs, Mercosur and the Pacific Alliance (PA from now on), show different trajectories, with the latter being the most integrated sub-region.…”
Section: General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…developed local or international supplier bases) had been existing in a country for a considerable period of time for higher R-GVC participation. The literature has shown a positive association, specifically a positive correlation, exists between FDI stocks and R-GVC indicators (Hanzl-Weiss et al, 2018;Mitra et al, 2020;ASEAN-Japan Centre, 2022;Buelens & Tirpak, 2017).…”
Section: Inward Fdi Stock Gdp Per Capita and Natural Resources Have B...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, the Global Infrastructure Hub estimated an infrastructure gap (i.e. the difference between the estimated investment need and investment expected under the current trends) ( of USD 94 trillion over the period 2016-2040 -a further USD 3.5 trillion would be required to achieve the SDGs (Oxford Economics/Global Infrastructure Hub, 2017 [92]) This investment gap is largest in the Americas (47%), followed by Africa (39%), Europe (16%), Oceania (10%) and Asia (10%) (Oxford Economics/Global Infrastructure Hub, 2017 [92]). If these deficiencies are not addressed, they can hamper productivity and socio-economic opportunities as well as countries' resilience in the face of demographic, climate and digital changes.…”
Section: Addressing Investment Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%