Spanish version of SPADI (shoulder pain and disability index) in musculoskeletal shoulder pain: a new 10-items version after confirmatory factor analysis

Luque-Suárez, Alejandro; Rondón-Ramos, Antonio; Fernández‐Sánchez, Manuel; Roach, Kathryn E.; Morales-Asencio, José Miguel

doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0436-4

Cited by 27 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 displays the patient demographics in the 19 included studies. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The 19 versions represent 16 different languages and cultures: Arabic, 17 Chinese, 18 Danish, 19 Dutch, 20 German, 21 Greek, 22 Indian (Tamil), 23 Indian (Telugu), 24 Italian, 25 Norwegian, 26 Persian, 27 Portuguese (Brazilian), 28,29 Spanish, 31,32 Thai, 33 Turkish. 34,35 Study sample sizes ranged from 44 to 365 patients.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From the 19 eligible studies, 16 studies (85% of studies) followed 100% of all the recommended crosscultural adaptation guidelines when performing the initial step of translation, synthesis, back-translation and included an expert committee review. [17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33]35 However, 16 studies (84% of studies) followed 100% of the cross-cultural adaptation guidelines for the step of pre-testing. [17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][28][29][30][31][32][33]35 The Dutch 20 study did not report the translation process and was rated as not applicable throughout the table.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…15 When compared to other shoulder PROs, the SPADI has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in the English language, [9][10][11] leading the SPADI to be used widely and translated into different languages. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] However, there is a paucity of published systematic reviews on the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measurement properties of the SPADI. Systematic reviews summarize and synthesize the highest level of evidence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The shoulder is the leading site of musculoskeletal pain. Patient-reported outcomes, such as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), allow us to assess shoulder pain in a clinical setting. Since the SPADI was developed in English, many cultures have cross-culturally adapted the SPADI for clinical use. The purpose of this review was to assess the translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures and measurement properties of the adapted SPADI. Methods: A systematic review was performed on cultural adaptations of the SPADI accessible through MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and/or Google Scholar. Included were prospective cohort studies that used an adapted version of the SPADI. All studies were evaluated according to the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations and the guidelines for measurement properties. Results: The search retrieved 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. According to the recommended guidelines for cross-cultural adaptations, 16 studies performed 100% of the steps and 1 study performed 80% of the steps. When evaluating the studies' psychometric properties based on the quality criteria, none of the studies reported all recommended measurement properties. The measurement property of reliability was reported fully by 74% of studies. Internal consistency was fully reported by 74% of studies. None of the studies were able to fully report responsiveness, agreement and/or construct validity. Conclusions: Whilst the majority of studies followed proper translation procedures, testing of the measurement properties were inadequate. Therefore, it is recommended that the current adapted versions of the SPADI undergo further evaluation before use in clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SPADI is a disease specific instrument and self administered questionnaire which measures pain and disability due to shoulder pain. Cronbach's alpha value of SPADI is 0.94 while internal consistency is 0.92 [16].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Shoulder Pain and Disability Among Post Mastectomy Patients

Arsh¹,

Ullah

2019

Phys Med Rehab Kuror

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine shoulder pain and disability among post mastectomy patients. Methods This cross sectional study was conducted in Peshawar Pakistan from June 2017 to June 2018. A self administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic information and clinical characteristics while Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was used to evaluate shoulder pain and disability. Female post mastectomy patients with age between 18 to 55 years were included. Patients with co-morbidities, bilateral mastectomy, history of trauma, history of shoulder pain before mastectomy and shoulder pain on non-operated side were excluded. SPSS version 23 was used to analyze the data. Results A total of 127 post mastectomy patients participated in the study. Out of total 127 participants, 99 (77.95%) reported shoulder pain and disability on operated site. Age (P value=0.181) and operated side i. e., right and left mastectomy (P value=0.324) were not significantly associated with shoulder pain and disability. On the other hand marital status (P value=0.04), educational status (P value=0.03) profession (P value<0.001) and time since surgery (P value=0.04) were significantly associated with shoulder pain and disability. Conclusion More than 2 third of post mastectomy patients suffer from shoulder pain and disability. Connective tissue fibrosis of shoulder joint seems to be the only reason for it. Physical therapy after mastectomy can help in preventing shoulder pain and disability.

show abstract

“…Discriminant validity is the ability of an instrument to measure a difference between two groups. The t-test was used to compare differences between patients with GC and healthy subjects, with the significance level set at P< 0.05 [31].…”

Section: Evaluation Of Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

GC-PROM: Validation of a patient-reported outcomes measure for Chinese patients with gastric cancer

Zhao

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There is increasing recognition that PROs are important in the estimation of the burden of long-term survival among patients with gastric cancer. The study aimed to develop a disease-specific instrument to assess patient-reported outcomes for Chinese patients with gastric cancer. Method: Following the FDA's draft guidance for patient-reported outcome, conceptual framework and item pool were defined based on relevant existing work. A draft scale was formed after revising some items based on feedback from experts and Chinese patients with gastric cancer. The pre-survey and formal survey were conducted in eight different hospitals in Shanxi Province, and two item-selection process based on classical test theory and item response theory. Finally, the patient-reported outcomes measure for Chinese patients with gastric cancer (GC-PROM) was validated in terms of reliability, validity, and feasibility. The minimal clinically important difference was determined by distribution-based method. Results: The final GC-PROM consisted of 38 items, 13 subdomains, and 4 domains. Reliability was verified by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for four domains and 13 subdomains respectively. The validity results showed that the multidimensional scale fulfilled expectations. In the formal survey, the completion rate was 96.16%, and the average filling time was less than half an hour. The values of the minimal clinically important difference were 4.14, 3.41, 3.37, and 3.28 in the four domains. Conclusions: The GC-PROM had good reliability, validity, and feasibility and thus can be considered an effective clinical evaluation instrument for Chinese patients with gastric cancer.

show abstract

Spanish version of SPADI (shoulder pain and disability index) in musculoskeletal shoulder pain: a new 10-items version after confirmatory factor analysis

Cited by 27 publications

References 28 publications

A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

A systematic review of the cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

Shoulder Pain and Disability Among Post Mastectomy Patients

GC-PROM: Validation of a patient-reported outcomes measure for Chinese patients with gastric cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About