Spanish Version of the Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-Efficacy Scale: Validity and Reliability

Sánchez, E.M. Medrano; Suárez-Serrano, Carmen; de-la-Casa-Almeida, María; Mohedo, Esther Díaz; Chillón‐Martínez, Raquel

doi:10.2522/ptj.20120128

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, it was also reported the adherence (range 0‐8 sessions) and the satisfaction, by the mean of the Spanish version of the Broome Pelvic Muscle Self‐Efficacy Scale (range 0‐10), which has been proven valid and reliable …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hypopressive technique versus pelvic floor muscle training for postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study

Juez

Núñez‐Córdoba

Couso

et al. 2019

Neurourology and Urodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: Abdominal hypopressive technique (AHT) is gaining popularity as an alternative to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during postpartum. Although, there is no solid evidence for its recommendation. Methods:We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in a university hospital with 105 primiparae who performed a two-month PFMT or AHT program. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of both treatments in terms of morphofunctional changes in 3D transperineal ultrasound, manometry, dynamometry, and differences in urinary incontinence symptoms (ICIQ-IU-SF) and satisfaction. Results: The average change in levator ani muscle was 1.2 mm higher in AHT group vs PFMT (95% confidence interval [CI], −2.2 to −0.2; P = .017). No statistically significant differences were shown in maximal strength changes between groups. After AHT, basal tone change was 63.0 g/cm 2 higher than PFMT (95% CI, −129 to 2.9; P = .06). A statistically significant reduction in ICIQ-IU-SF was observed after both treatments [(PFMT, −0.8 points; 95% CI, −1.4 to −0.1; P = .015), (AHT, −0.7 points; 95% CI, −1.3 to −0.1; P = .018]. AHT showed a higher median satisfaction score than PFMT (P = .004). Conclusions: This preliminary study is the first that analyses the effect of AHT vs PFMT during postpartum. The results suggest a higher improve for AHT in levator muscle thickness and satisfaction compared to PFMT. These must be considered with caution due to the limitations of the study. Further randomized clinical trials about both techniques during postpartum are required. K E Y W O R D S 3D transperineal ultrasound, abdominal hypopressive technique, muscle tone, pelvic floor muscle training, postpartum

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hypopressive technique versus pelvic floor muscle training for postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study

Juez

Núñez‐Córdoba

Couso

et al. 2019

Neurourology and Urodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After reading the titles and applying the selection criteria to the complete documents, 13 articles and a total of 15 questionnaires were selected [ 8 , 14 , 15 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These questionnaires assess the symptoms of POP and UI as well as their classification and severity and how they affect women [ 14 , 23 , 24 , 30 , 31 ]: Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Bladder control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ), Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ), Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire (EPIQ) and Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL). Also included is a questionnaire that measures the expectations of self-efficacy and results in women with pelvic floor disorders after performing exercises focused on this [ 27 ]: the Broome Pelvic Muscle Self- Efficacy Scale.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Spanish Questionnaires for the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Women: A Systematic Review of the Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties

Guallar-Bouloc

Gómez-Bueno

Gónzalez-Sánchez

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pelvic floor dysfunctions affect a third of the adult female population, including a large number of clinical conditions, which can be evaluated through validated questionnaires that inform us of the status and perception of women both objectively and subjectively. The main objective of this study was to review and explain the topics of the validated questionnaires in Spanish on pelvic floor dysfunctions and to review their psychometric properties. Methods: A systematic review was carried out in the PUBMED and WOS databases. The keywords used were in PUBMED: ((((((((“Fecal Incontinence” [Mesh]) OR “Urinary Incontinence” [Mesh]) OR “Pelvic Organ Prolapse” [Mesh]) OR “Pelvic Floor Disorders” [Mesh]) OR “Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological” [Mesh]) OR “Pelvic Girdle Pain” [Mesh]) OR “sexual function” [Title/Abstract]) OR “Prolapse” [Title/Abstract]) AND “Surveys and Questionnaires” [Mesh] AND “Validation” [Title/Abstract] combined with the Boolean operators “AND”/“OR”. In contrast, in WOS, a segregated search was carried out with each of the terms of pelvic floor dysfunction together with “Validation” and “Surveys and Questionnaires”. All articles published up to 19 November 2021 were considered. Methodological quality was assessed with the COSMIN scale. Results: A total of 687 articles were identified, of which 13 were included. The evaluated questionnaires and the structural characteristics and psychometric properties of each of them were collected. Conclusion: The Spanish versions of the questionnaires show good basic structural and psychometric characteristics for the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions and that they resemble other versions of the same questionnaire published in other languages.

show abstract

“…Phase 2: Followed the suggestions of Diane et al (16,17), this first translation was sent separately to two bilingual native-English-speaking translators who were specialists in health policy and had not seen the original tool. Once the two back-translations were completed, another meeting was held with the same committee members to discuss the discrepancies among the forward-translated version (Chinese), the back-translated version (English) and the original UNAIDS version.…”

Section: Linguistic Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Chinese version of monitoring and evaluation system strengthening tool for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) capacity building: Development and evaluation

Zhao

Ren

Zhang

et al. 2015

BST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spanish Version of the Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-Efficacy Scale: Validity and Reliability

Abstract: The Spanish version of the Broome questionnaire for self-efficacy appears to be useful as a measuring tool for a psychometrically accurate, clinically relevant estimation of women's self-efficacy in performing pelvic-floor exercises.

Cited by 9 publications

References 30 publications

Hypopressive technique versus pelvic floor muscle training for postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study

Hypopressive technique versus pelvic floor muscle training for postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation: A prospective cohort study

Spanish Questionnaires for the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Women: A Systematic Review of the Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties

The Chinese version of monitoring and evaluation system strengthening tool for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) capacity building: Development and evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About