Spanish Version of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire

Pérez-Fabello, Marı́a José; Campos, Alfredo

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00916

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(87 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… n.d.s. Pérez-Fabello & Campos 2020 [ 116 ] ES S Students 394 21.0 101♀, 293♂ Internal consistency vision α =0.68 sound α =0.77 smell α =0.72 taste α =0.75 touch α =0.75 body α =0.68 emotions α =0.72 Very good + Very good sample size, Cronbach’s alpha for each subscales reported, structural validity evaluated and sufficient. Sport Imagery Ability Measure (SIAM) Sport Watt 2003 1 [ 36 ] AU E Students and athletes 5 15-16 NR Development 72.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… n.d.s. Pérez-Fabello & Campos 2020 [ 116 ] ES S Students 394 21.0 101♀, 293♂ Construct validity- structural validity CFA for long version with 7 factor model provided a good model fit: χ 2 (733.95), df=413, GFI=0.89, CFI=0.92, NNFI=0.91, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.05. Very good + Accepted model fit: CFI >0.95, or SRMR <0.08, or RMSEA <0.06.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, 74 out of the 90 articles reported reliability. A total of 34 studies [ 29 , 94 – 97 , 102 , 103 , 105 – 107 , 111 , 112 , 116 , 118 , 119 , 124 – 126 , 133 , 137 – 140 , 142 , 145 , 148 , 150 , 152 – 154 , 157 , 158 , 168 , 169 ] were rated as very good or adequate. A total of 22 studies [ 30 , 34 , 35 , 41 , 42 , 98 , 99 , 101 , 104 , 108 , 114 , 115 , 121 , 122 , 129 , 132 , 141 , 143 , 146 , 156 , 160 , 170 ] were rated as inadequate regarding their methodological quality.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties

Suica

Behrendt

Gäumann

et al. 2022

BMC Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Over the last two centuries, researchers developed several assessments to evaluate the multidimensional construct of imagery. However, no comprehensive systematic review (SR) exists for imagery ability evaluation methods and an in-depth quality evaluation of their psychometric properties. Methods We performed a comprehensive systematic search in six databases in the disciplines of sport, psychology, medicine, education: SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC. Two reviewers independently identified and screened articles for selection. COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. All included assessments were evaluated for quality using criteria for good measurement properties. The evidence synthesis was summarised by using the GRADE approach. Results In total, 121 articles reporting 155 studies and describing 65 assessments were included. We categorised assessments based on their construct on: (1) motor imagery (n = 15), (2) mental imagery (n = 48) and (3) mental chronometry (n = 2). Methodological quality of studies was mainly doubtful or inadequate. The psychometric properties of most assessments were insufficient or indeterminate. The best rated assessments with sufficient psychometric properties were MIQ, MIQ-R, MIQ-3, and VMIQ-2 for evaluation of motor imagery ability. Regarding mental imagery evaluation, only SIAQ and VVIQ showed sufficient psychometric properties. Conclusion Various assessments exist to evaluate an individual’s imagery ability within different dimensions or modalities of imagery in different disciplines. However, the psychometric properties of most assessments are insufficient or indeterminate. Several assessments should be revised and further validated. Moreover, most studies were only evaluated with students. Further cross-disciplinary validation studies are needed including older populations with a larger age range. Our findings allow clinicians, coaches, teachers, and researchers to select a suitable imagery ability assessment for their setting and goals based on information about the focus and quality of the assessments. Systematic reviews register PROSPERO CRD42017077004.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties

Suica

Behrendt

Gäumann

et al. 2022

BMC Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, these interpretations of cultural differences in taste, smell, and sound are only tentative and will be veri ed in the future. Furthermore, Psi-Q has already been translated into Spanish (Pérez-Fabello & Campos, 2020) and Dutch (Woelk et al, 2022), and comparative studies with more diverse cultures could be conducted.…”

Section: Cultural Comparison Of Multisensory Imagery Abilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing and Validating a Japanese Version of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q)

Hitsuwari

Nomura

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mental imagery refers to the representation of stimuli that are not physically present and has long been a subject of interest in psychology. Despite this, most of the research on mental imagery has been limited to visual images, with other types of imagery, such as sound and smell, receiving limited attention. A possible reason for this is the lack of appropriate scales to measure vividness of multisensory imagery. The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Scale (Psi-Q) has been developed to address this issue and has been used in several studies to measure the vividness of seven imagery: vision, sound, smell, taste, touch, body, and feeling. In this study of 400 participants in Japan, the Psi-Q was translated and tested for reliability and validity. Results showed good internal reliability and retest reliability, moderate to high correlations with other measures of construct validity, including mindfulness, Big Five, and life satisfaction. Additionally, there is no significant difference in total Psi-Q scores between the Japanese and British samples, although some differences were found in individual sensory imagery abilities. The study provides valuable insights into multisensory mental imagery and it is expected that research dealing simultaneously with the responses of multisensory modalities will further accumulate.

show abstract

“…Besides, the Psi-Q could provide direct comparison of imagery between olfactory and other modalities. Another advantage of the Psi-Q is that it has been validated in Spanish (103) . One possible disadvantage of the VOIQ is that there is no information reported on the criterion validity.…”

Section: Olfactory Imagerymentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of olfactory related questionnaires and scales

Han¹,

Su²,

Qin³

et al. 2020

Rhin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE: Although neglected by science for a long time, the sense of olfaction has received increasing attention from research areas including psychology, neuroscience, clinical medicine and nutrition. With the rise of psychophysical and neuroimaging re- search into olfaction, psychometric tools (e.g. questionnaires and scales) are the basis for the quantitative exploration of inter-in- dividual variability regarding olfactory related responses. The current systematic review is to summarize existing olfaction related questionnaires and/or scales. METHODS: Peer-reviewed literature on scales and questionnaires related to perception of odors were searched from online databa- ses (PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO). Twenty-one articles that meet the following criteria were included in the review: “hu- man species”, “no physical odor stimuli” and “describing the original development of the tool”, and “with specific focus on olfaction or odor related responses or behaviors”. The psychometric properties, advantages and possible disadvantages were discussed. RESULTS: Existing psychometric measures focus on various aspects of olfactory related responses and behaviors, including af- fective experiences of odor perception, awareness and attitude towards olfaction, olfactory function and the quality of life change due to olfactory dysfunction, and the ability to create vivid mental odor images. While most of them have been tested to have good reliability and validity, some were relatively time-consuming due to the number of questionnaire items. Besides, although many measures have been used in clinical populations, few have provided information on the predictive validity regarding effecti- veness of clinical intervention on changes of certain responses or behaviors. SUMMARY: The current review provides an overview of olfactory related questionnaires and scales, highlighting the emotional and affective impact of olfaction and the impact on quality of life due to olfactory dysfunction. With growing interest in olfaction as an important sense, the development and use of psychometrically sound measurements in conjunction with objective assess- ments will advance our understanding of human olfaction and olfactory dysfunction. The review provides a guide for researchers and clinicians alike to select olfactory scales suitable for olfactory research with different experimental purposes and specific samples.

show abstract

Spanish Version of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire

Cited by 14 publications

References 48 publications

Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties

Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties

Developing and Validating a Japanese Version of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q)

A systematic review of olfactory related questionnaires and scales

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About