2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spanwise length and mesh resolution effects on simulated flow around a 5:1 rectangular cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the inevitable difference of 2D numerical simulation. Previous studies (Bruno et al 2012, Zhang et al 2020 have also shown that insufficient spanwise mesh resolution results in a slight decrease in St. Compared with the results of DNS (Trais et al 2015), the St value of the present simulation is about 3% smaller, which is completely acceptable.…”
Section: Grid Independency Studysupporting
confidence: 45%
“…This may be due to the inevitable difference of 2D numerical simulation. Previous studies (Bruno et al 2012, Zhang et al 2020 have also shown that insufficient spanwise mesh resolution results in a slight decrease in St. Compared with the results of DNS (Trais et al 2015), the St value of the present simulation is about 3% smaller, which is completely acceptable.…”
Section: Grid Independency Studysupporting
confidence: 45%
“…It is known that mesh resolution, in both the x – y plane and the spanwise direction, and the spanwise domain size may have significant influences on the simulated flow around a rectangular prism (Bruno, Coste & Fransos 2012; Zhang & Xu 2020). In the present study, a mesh dependence study is performed.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D flow field around the cylinder can also be studied based on the instantaneous vortex structures, which can be identified by the second invariant Q (Zhang and Xu, 2020):where, S=12(uixj+ujxi) is symmetric component of U, and Ω=12(uixjujxi) is an antisymmetric one; and represents the Hamiltonian operator. The shear strain rate and vorticity magnitude are well balanced by Q .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear strain rate and vorticity magnitude are well balanced by Q . A positive value of Q represents rotational flow, and a higher value corresponds to a higher vortex intensity (Zhang and Xu, 2020). Therefore, the Q criterion is significantly better than the vorticity criteria for extracting the vortices around the cylinder and C-ring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%