2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spare parts inventory management: New evidence from distribution fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the MRO inventory has irregular demand due to which forecasting its demand is a difficult task compared to the regular demand inventory [9] and therefore, it has great uncertainty because its consumption only depends only on maintenance phenomena which are unpredictable events. Hence, MRO inventory management is a great challenge for businesses with respect to reducing access inventory and increasing service level towards maintenance phenomena [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the MRO inventory has irregular demand due to which forecasting its demand is a difficult task compared to the regular demand inventory [9] and therefore, it has great uncertainty because its consumption only depends only on maintenance phenomena which are unpredictable events. Hence, MRO inventory management is a great challenge for businesses with respect to reducing access inventory and increasing service level towards maintenance phenomena [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Basten and Ryan [13] compared two inventory management models based on intervals between maintenance sessions. Likewise, Turini and Meisser [14] used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to find the probability distribution that best fits spare part demand. In conclusion, current research works analyze the importance of maintenance and propose several types of models to predict machine part failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard assumption is that lead time demand follows a normal or Poisson distribution. This is often not true, particularly for high irregular demand patterns (e.g., see Turrini and Meissner 2017). The departures from the assumed distribution may lead to very unsatisfactory inventory performance, e.g., high inventory costs (Nenes et al 2010, Turrini andMeissner 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different distribution models have been used in the literature, including the stuttering Poisson (or geometric Poisson e.g., see Chen 2012), zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP), hurdle shifted Poisson (HSP), negative binomial, normal and gamma distributions (e.g., see Snyder et al 2012, Costantino et al 2017, Turrini and Meissner 2017. Among these distributions, the stuttering Poisson is computationally intensive, ZIP, HSP and negative binomial distribution are only applicable for over-Poisson dispersive cases and the normal and gamma distributions are continuous distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation