2021 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2021 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2021 Workshop on Robotics in Edu 2021
DOI: 10.1109/lars/sbr/wre54079.2021.9605461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spark in the Dark: Evaluating Encoder-Decoder Pairs for COVID-19 CT’s Semantic Segmentation

Abstract: With the COVID-19 global pandemic, computerassisted diagnoses of medical images have gained a lot of attention, and robust methods of Semantic Segmentation of Computed Tomography (CT) turned highly desirable. Semantic Segmentation of CT is one of many research fields of automatic detection of Covid-19 and was widely explored since the Covid-19 outbreak. In the robotic field, S emantic S egmentation of organs and CTs are widely used in robots developed for surgery tasks. As new methods and new datasets are prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The encoder-decoder network chosen to evaluate the dataset augmentations was the RegNetx-002 [Xu et al 2021] encoder and U-net++ [Zhou et al 2018] decoder. Since the encoders achieved close results in the comparison performed in [Krinski et al 2021], the RegNetx-002 was chosen due to being the network with a smaller number of parameters, making the RegNetx-002 faster for training. The U-net++ was chosen because it achieved the highest F-score compared with other decoders [Krinski et al 2021].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The encoder-decoder network chosen to evaluate the dataset augmentations was the RegNetx-002 [Xu et al 2021] encoder and U-net++ [Zhou et al 2018] decoder. Since the encoders achieved close results in the comparison performed in [Krinski et al 2021], the RegNetx-002 was chosen due to being the network with a smaller number of parameters, making the RegNetx-002 faster for training. The U-net++ was chosen because it achieved the highest F-score compared with other decoders [Krinski et al 2021].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the encoders achieved close results in the comparison performed in [Krinski et al 2021], the RegNetx-002 was chosen due to being the network with a smaller number of parameters, making the RegNetx-002 faster for training. The U-net++ was chosen because it achieved the highest F-score compared with other decoders [Krinski et al 2021]. The evaluation of how data augmentation affects the results of different encoders and decoders was left for future evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations