2021
DOI: 10.12928/telkomnika.v19i6.22027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spark plug failure detection using Z-freq and machine learning

Abstract: Preprogrammed monitoring of engine failure due to spark plug misfire can be traced using a method called machine learning. Unluckily, a challenge to get a high-efficiency rate because of a massive volume of training data is required. During the study, these failure-generated were enhanced with a novel statistical signal-based analysis called Z-freq to improve the exploration. This study is an exploration of the time and frequency content attained from the engine after it goes under a specific situation. Throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows a green scattered graph voltage (V) versus acceleration (m/s 2 ) at varying engine revolution speeds for 320g R134a with the compressor on. The scattered graph ascends as the data points increase in value as the RPM increases [12,21,22]. The data points are also tightly clustered as they are very close to each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows a green scattered graph voltage (V) versus acceleration (m/s 2 ) at varying engine revolution speeds for 320g R134a with the compressor on. The scattered graph ascends as the data points increase in value as the RPM increases [12,21,22]. The data points are also tightly clustered as they are very close to each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Ngatiman et. al in year 2021 [22]. Z-freq Hybrid is a new statistical signal analysis from two different types of sensors based on frequency domain.…”
Section: Z-freq Hybrid Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the tabulated data, an initial objective has been met, which this new method named Z-freq can differentiate the fault pattern. [12], [13] From this observation, there is a little increment for static fault, about 12% from the normal condition for Z-freq value, a significant increment of about 43% for coupled fault and 51% for dynamic fault. This little percentage difference between coupled and dynamic also occurred in I-kaz and RMS.…”
Section: Fig 3 -Rotor Disk Faults Diagnostic Process Flow Using Z-freqmentioning
confidence: 88%