2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study

Abstract: Background: In the context of systems biology, few sparse approaches have been proposed so far to integrate several data sets. It is however an important and fundamental issue that will be widely encountered in post genomic studies, when simultaneously analyzing transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics data using different platforms, so as to understand the mutual interactions between the different data sets. In this high dimensional setting, variable selection is crucial to give interpretable results. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
167
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
167
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lê Cao et al (2008Cao et al ( , 2009) proposed a sparse PLS approach to combine integration and simultaneous variable (e.g. gene) selection in one step.…”
Section: Methodsologies For Integrated Transcriptomics and Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lê Cao et al (2008Cao et al ( , 2009) proposed a sparse PLS approach to combine integration and simultaneous variable (e.g. gene) selection in one step.…”
Section: Methodsologies For Integrated Transcriptomics and Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the sparse partial least square (sPLS) correlations between profiles of expression of sRNAs and mRNAs. The sPLS approach has been recently developed to perform simultaneous variable selection in the two data sets (33,34). Variable selection is achieved by introducing LASSO penalization on the pair of loading vectors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are multivariate models to account for pleiotropic effects [43, 44] (i.e., genetic variants associated with multiple imaging quantitative traits) and the covariance structure among imaging endophenotypes [45, 46]. Two block methods include sparse CCA [47, 48], regularized kernel CCA [49] and sparse PLS correlation (PLSC) [50, 51], which are usually used for correspondence analysis between two modalities. Floch et al [50] compared the performance of detecting the correlation between fMRI imaging and SNP data with different methods such as univariate approach, PLSC, sparse PLSC, regularized kernel CCA, and their combinations with PCA and pre-filters.…”
Section: Sparse Models For [Correlation/association] Analysis Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This general formulation includes a variety of existing sparse CCA models as specific examples [47, 58], e.g., CCA- l 1 or CCA-elastic net (λ 1 =0, λ 2 =0) and CCA-group lasso (τ 1 =0, τ 2 =0) models. The solution of Eq.1 usually involves with the inversion of the covariance matrices, which might be non-invertible because of the high dimensionality of data.…”
Section: Sparse Models For [Correlation/association] Analysis Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%