2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-020-00140-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse-Lagrangian PDF Modelling of Silica Synthesis from Silane Jets in Vitiated Co-flows with Varying Inflow Conditions

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of experimental and numerical results for a series of turbulent reacting jets where silica nanoparticles are formed and grow due to surface growth and agglomeration. We use large-eddy simulation coupled with a multiple mapping conditioning approach for the solution of the transport equation for the joint probability density function of scalar composition and particulate size distribution. The model considers inception based on finite-rate chemistry, volumetric surface growth an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UV laser sheet is 700 µm thick and 58 mm tall to avoid exceeding the OH saturation intensity (10 mJ/cm 2 [30]) with a shot energy of no more than 3.5 mJ, thus ensuring operation within the linear LIF regime. In an unrelated experiment using the same set-up [31], the OH-PLIF signal was found to correlate linearly with the concentration of silane doping (0-3000 ppm) added to a vitiated co-flow burner with an R 2 coefficient of 0.9994, further confirming linearity.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UV laser sheet is 700 µm thick and 58 mm tall to avoid exceeding the OH saturation intensity (10 mJ/cm 2 [30]) with a shot energy of no more than 3.5 mJ, thus ensuring operation within the linear LIF regime. In an unrelated experiment using the same set-up [31], the OH-PLIF signal was found to correlate linearly with the concentration of silane doping (0-3000 ppm) added to a vitiated co-flow burner with an R 2 coefficient of 0.9994, further confirming linearity.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The second one is a systematic error incurred by the value of the absorption function E(m) in Eq. (31). The instrumentation error originates from the intrinsic uncertainty in the measurement of light intensity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%