2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0219467816500042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Mesh Segmentation

Abstract: In this paper, we present a method for 3D mesh segmentation based on sparse non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). Image analysis techniques based on NMF have been shown to decompose images into semantically meaningful local features. Since the features and coefficients are represented in terms of non-negative values, the features contribute to the resulting images in an intuitive, additive fashion. Like spectral mesh segmentation, our method relies on the construction of an affinity matrix which depends on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that GISIFs performs unstably on the low-quality model with obvious asymmetry, while our method achieves stable factorization results, which are visualized to be symmetric and part-aware, thus can help to detect symmetry when models are not provided in high quality. In order to further demonstrate the characteristics of our framework, we also make comparisons with the most related work of Mcgraw et al [17] and Liu et al [39] in segmentation and with the related works in saliency detection. The segmentation results of [17,39] are shown in (a) and (b), respectively, as can be seen from Figure 13.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that GISIFs performs unstably on the low-quality model with obvious asymmetry, while our method achieves stable factorization results, which are visualized to be symmetric and part-aware, thus can help to detect symmetry when models are not provided in high quality. In order to further demonstrate the characteristics of our framework, we also make comparisons with the most related work of Mcgraw et al [17] and Liu et al [39] in segmentation and with the related works in saliency detection. The segmentation results of [17,39] are shown in (a) and (b), respectively, as can be seen from Figure 13.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further demonstrate the characteristics of our framework, we also make comparisons with the most related work of Mcgraw et al [17] and Liu et al [39] in segmentation and with the related works in saliency detection. The segmentation results of [17,39] are shown in (a) and (b), respectively, as can be seen from Figure 13. Spectral mesh segmentation presented in [39] can achieve idea results for most models; however, it requires SVD decomposition process together with kmeans clustering, which are time consuming.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations