Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2746539.2746608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Quantum Codes from Quantum Circuits

Abstract: Sparse quantum codes are analogous to LDPC codes in that their check operators require examining only a constant number of qubits. In contrast to LDPC codes, good sparse quantum codes are not known, and even to encode a single qubit, the best known distance is O( n log(n)), due to Freedman, Meyer and Luo.We construct a new family of sparse quantum subsystem codes with minimum distance n 1− for = O(1/ √ log n). A variant of these codes exists in D spatial dimensions and has d = n 1− −1/D , nearly saturating a b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Present results make two steps in this direction. First, the observation that ML decoding under these conditions amounts to decoding the code [21,22] associated with the circuit EEG, in the absence of correlations. Second, the structure of this latter code can be significantly simplified using row-reduction transformations, while leaving the probability of ML decoding unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Present results make two steps in this direction. First, the observation that ML decoding under these conditions amounts to decoding the code [21,22] associated with the circuit EEG, in the absence of correlations. Second, the structure of this latter code can be significantly simplified using row-reduction transformations, while leaving the probability of ML decoding unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this work is to give an explicit numerically efficient algorithm for analyzing error correlations resulting from a given qubit-based Clifford measurement circuit, and for constructing decoders optimized for such a circuit. Main result is that such correlations can be accounted for by using phenomenological error model (no error correlations) with the circuit-associated subsystem code constructed by Bacon, Flammia, Harrow, and Shi [21,22]. Thus, any generic decoder capable of dealing with uncorrelated data and syndrome measurement errors in highly-degenerate sparse-generator subsystem codes can be rendered to account for circuit-level error correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a concatenated base code, the resulting subsystem code appears to have fractal structure. Again, the relationship between these codes and our work is purely superficial, in particular noting that the FPCs are commuting stabilizer code models while the codes of [69] are non-commuting subsystem codes.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, a new code construction has appeared that produces local subsystem codes with properties inherited from an arbitrary base stabilizer code [69]. Using a concatenated base code, the resulting subsystem code appears to have fractal structure.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result on subsystem codes was adapted by Bravyi [17] to show that subsystem codes satisfy the bound kd 1/(D−1) ≤ O(n). Quantum stabilizer codes based on the toric code saturate these bounds for D = 2, and subsystem codes that saturate for D = 2 [17] or nearly saturate for D ≥ 3 [18] are also known.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%