2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2018.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse regression interaction models for spatial prediction of soil properties in 3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For MP and CAL grid-search steps, these locations were selected using the method of Meyer et al [46] to benefit splitting diversity. In the final model adjustment, prior to predictions, sample-site splitting was conducted by means of their coordinates and the K-means algorithm to ensure equal spatial distribution [48].…”
Section: Model Selection and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For MP and CAL grid-search steps, these locations were selected using the method of Meyer et al [46] to benefit splitting diversity. In the final model adjustment, prior to predictions, sample-site splitting was conducted by means of their coordinates and the K-means algorithm to ensure equal spatial distribution [48].…”
Section: Model Selection and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R packages 'raster' [55] and 'sf ' [56] were used for remote sensing and spatial data manipulation, and 'doParallel' [57] for parallel computing. An adaptation of the stratfold3d function of the 'sparsereg3D' package [48] was used to make the equally spatially distributed LLOCV folds, while the spatially random splits were created with the CreateSpacetimeFolds function from the 'CAST' package [58].…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test dataset was then used to assess the performance of the model. The advantage of nested LLOCV over standard LLOCV is that the data of the test fold are not used to tune the RF hyperparameters [46]. The hyperparameters for the final RF models were then calculated based on standard LLOCV, i.e., without nested folds (their role is just to approximate the accuracy of the final model).…”
Section: Real-world Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The daily MeteoSerbia1km dataset was validated using nested 5-fold LLOCV, which combines nested k-fold 32 and leave-location-out cross-validation. For nested 5-fold LLOCV, as with the regular 5-fold LLOCV, the entire dataset was split into five folds.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%