2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/203537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Regularization-Based Reconstruction for Bioluminescence Tomography Using a Multilevel Adaptive Finite Element Method

Abstract: Bioluminescence tomography (BLT) is a promising tool for studying physiological and pathological processes at cellular and molecular levels. In most clinical or preclinical practices, fine discretization is needed for recovering sources with acceptable resolution when solving BLT with finite element method (FEM). Nevertheless, uniformly fine meshes would cause large dataset and overfine meshes might aggravate the ill-posedness of BLT. Additionally, accurately quantitative information of density and power has n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, l 1 -norm based sparse regularization methods have attracted considerable amount of attention in BLT [10, 2025], and the reconstructions' results therein demonstrate that l 1 -norm solution fits the sparsity nature of bioluminescent source distribution in BLT practice. Using l 1 regularization, we formulate the BLT inverse problem to the following optimization problem: minS12||ASΦm||22+τ||S||1, where ||·|| 2 denotes the Euclidean norm, ||·|| 1 is the l 1 norm, and τ > 0 is a regularization parameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, l 1 -norm based sparse regularization methods have attracted considerable amount of attention in BLT [10, 2025], and the reconstructions' results therein demonstrate that l 1 -norm solution fits the sparsity nature of bioluminescent source distribution in BLT practice. Using l 1 regularization, we formulate the BLT inverse problem to the following optimization problem: minS12||ASΦm||22+τ||S||1, where ||·|| 2 denotes the Euclidean norm, ||·|| 1 is the l 1 norm, and τ > 0 is a regularization parameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous studies, two kinds of regularization methods were utilized as the penalty function, including the Tikhonov regularization method and the spares regularization method [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . For the Tikhonov regularization, the penalty function was defined as an l 2 norm of k S ; and for the sparse regularization, the penalty function was defined as an l 1 norm.…”
Section: (A) Hp Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of our home-developed tri-modality BLT/FMT/micro-CT system, we have developed some reconstruction algorithms for 3D optical imaging based on the diffusion equation (DE) and the finite element method (FEM), including the adaptive hp FEM (hp-FEM) 13 , Tikhonov regularization based truncated total least squares and multi-phase level set algorithm [14][15][16] , sparse regularization based truncated Newton interior-point method and incomplete variables truncated conjugate gradient method [17][18][19] . Furthermore, in order to deal with the problem of early gastric cancer detection, we proposed a hybrid diffusion-radiosity theory (HDRT) model based reconstruction algorithm 24 and an endoscopic algorithm 25 .…”
Section: Development Of the Reconstruction Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, it is necessary to incorporate further information about the desired solution to stabilize the problem and to single out a meaningful and stable solution, which is the purpose of regularization [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Through the most well-known Tikhonov regularization method [6], a well-posed optimization problem to approximate the original BLT problem is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%