We compared folding properties of designed protein Top7 and natural protein S6 by using coarse-grained chain models with a mainly native-centric construct that accounted also for nonnative hydrophobic interactions and desolvation barriers. Top7 and S6 have similar secondary structure elements and are approximately equal in length and hydrophobic composition. Yet their experimental folding kinetics were drastically different. Consistent with experiment, our simulated folding chevron arm for Top7 exhibited a severe rollover, whereas that for S6 was essentially linear, and Top7 model kinetic relaxation was multiphasic under strongly folding conditions. The peculiar behavior of Top7 was associated with several classes of kinetic traps in our model. Significantly, the amino acid residues participating in nonnative interactions in trapped conformations in our Top7 model overlapped with those deduced experimentally. These affirmations suggest that the simple ingredients of native topology plus sequence-dependent nonnative interactions are sufficient to account for some key features of protein folding kinetics. Notably, when nonnative interactions were absent in the model, Top7 chevron rollover was not correctly predicted. In contrast, nonnative interactions had little effect on the quasi linearity of the model folding chevron arm for S6. This intriguing distinction indicates that folding cooperativity is governed by a subtle interplay between the sequence-dependent driving forces for native topology and the locations of favorable nonnative interactions entailed by the same sequence. Constructed with a capability to mimic this interplay, our simple modeling approach should be useful in general for assessing a designed sequence's potential to fold cooperatively.T he study of protein folding is important not only for deciphering the folding process and how misfolding can occur. The principles developed in theoretical investigations of folding (1-3) have provided insights into a broad range of molecularrecognition phenomena and dynamic behaviors in biology. Recent examples include protein-protein interactions (4), function of biomolecular machines (5), effects of desolvation in selfassembly (6, 7), and switch-like properties in binding (8). Among naturally evolved proteins, many fold cooperatively in a twostate-like manner (9), which is a remarkable feat from the vantage point of polymer physics (10). Although not all natural proteins share this property (11), its commonality argues that folding cooperativity may serve crucial biological functions such as guarding against harmful aggregation (12).If cooperative folding can be a desirable trait under certain circumstances, a fundamental question arises: Can all folded globular structures attain a high degree of folding cooperativity? A revealing case is the designed protein Top7 (13), which folds to a de novo target structure that did not exist previously in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) but does so noncooperatively (14, 15). One possible reason for Top7's failure to fold coo...