2020 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/spawc48557.2020.9154213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparsity-Adaptive Beamspace Channel Estimation for 1-Bit mmWave Massive MIMO Systems

Abstract: We propose sparsity-adaptive beamspace channel estimation algorithms that improve accuracy for 1-bit data converters in all-digital millimeter-wave (mmWave) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) basestations. Our algorithms include a tuning stage based on Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE) that automatically selects optimal denoising parameters depending on the instantaneous channel conditions. Simulation results with line-of-sight (LoS) and non-LoS mmWave massive MIMO channel models show that our a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this low-complexity setting, the concept of estimating tuning parameters directly from the noisy observations has been used recently for adaptive denoising of mmWave [7]- [9] or OFDM [10] channel vectors. Such denoising algorithms typically require a tuning parameter: the denoising threshold.…”
Section: A Prior Art In Blind and Nonparametric Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this low-complexity setting, the concept of estimating tuning parameters directly from the noisy observations has been used recently for adaptive denoising of mmWave [7]- [9] or OFDM [10] channel vectors. Such denoising algorithms typically require a tuning parameter: the denoising threshold.…”
Section: A Prior Art In Blind and Nonparametric Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focus on noisy observations of signal vectors that are sparse, i.e., only few entries carry most of the signals' energy. Examples of sparse vectors in wireless systems include (i) the beamspace-domain representation of all-digital mmWave multi-antenna channel vectors [7]- [9], (ii) the delay-domain representation of OFDM channel vectors [10], and (iii) the antenna-domain representation of channel vectors in cell-free MIMO wireless systems [11]. We will explain how sparsity can be exploited to estimate parameters and denoise noisy observations of sparse vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, L denotes the total number of arriving paths, α ∈ C is the channel gain of the th path, and a(φ ) is the complexvalued sinusoid vector, where φ ∈ [0, 2π) is determined by the th path's angle-of-arrival. If the number of paths L is small compared to BS antenna array size B, which is the case in mmWave massive MIMO [6], then the beamspace channel vector ĥ = Fh of each UE will be sparse; this enables low-complexity baseband processing algorithms, such as data detectors and channel estimators [10]- [12], [28].…”
Section: A Beamspace Massive Mu-mimo Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that in (2), the residual distortion e is not necessarily independent of the sparse signal s. System Model 2 is relevant in the following scenarios: (i) When estimating a sparse signal s from a noisy measurement y by applying an (entry-wise) denoising or estimation function, producing the signal estimate s = µ(y). This scenario finds use for channelvector denosing [11], [12], for example. (ii) When modeling nonlinearlties caused by hardware impairments [15], in which case the distorted version of the noisy received signal can be expressed as r = µ(y).…”
Section: A System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that in (2), the residual distortion e is not necessarily independent of the sparse signal s. System Model 2 is relevant when applying (entry-wise) estimation or denoising functions, which finds use for channel-vector denosing [11], [12], or to model nonlinearlties at the output of System Model 1 when modeling the impact of hardware impairments [15].…”
Section: Low-complexity Blind Estimators a System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%