2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45620-1_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spass Version 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The csur_cc compiler also collects trust assertions as it analyzes C code, and spits out a collection of Horn clauses which are then fed to an ¿ ¡ solver-currently SPASS [27,26] or the first author's prototype h1 prover. The fact that most clauses are in ¿ ¤…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The csur_cc compiler also collects trust assertions as it analyzes C code, and spits out a collection of Horn clauses which are then fed to an ¿ ¡ solver-currently SPASS [27,26] or the first author's prototype h1 prover. The fact that most clauses are in ¿ ¤…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first implementation of case splitting in a resolution theorem prover based on the superposition calculus is SPASS [14], dating from the mid-1990s. The current version of SPASS implements a labelled splitting calculus due to Fietzke and Weidenbach [4], which we have followed.…”
Section: Splitting With Backtrackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viki obtains the security requirements from the UMLsec elements and the predefined values used in sequence diagrams [15]. Then, these requirements are formalised in First-Order Logic and analysed with automatic theorem provers (e-SETHEO [16] and SPASS [17]) to find a flaw. If a flaw is found, a Prolog engine can be used to generate the attack trace of such flaw and solve it.…”
Section: Securing Provenance Based-auditsmentioning
confidence: 99%