Spasticity assessment based on the Hilbert–Huang transform marginal spectrum entropy and the root mean square of surface electromyography signals: a preliminary study

Abstract

BackgroundMost of the objective and quantitative methods proposed for spasticity measurement are not suitable for clinical application, and methods for surface electromyography (sEMG) signal processing are mainly limited to the time-domain. This study aims to quantify muscle activity in the time–frequency domain, and develop a practical clinical method for the objective and reliable evaluation of the spasticity based on the Hilbert–Huang transform marginal spectrum entropy (HMSEN) and the root mean square (RMS) of sEMG signals.MethodsTwenty-six stroke patients with elbow flexor spasticity participated in the study. The subjects were tested at sitting position with the upper limb stretched towards the ground. The HMSEN of the sEMG signals obtained from the biceps brachii was employed to facilitate the stretch reflex onset (SRO) detection. Then, the difference between the RMS of a fixed-length sEMG signal obtained after the SRO and the RMS of a baseline sEMG signal, denoted as the RMS difference (RMSD), was employed to evaluate the spasticity level. The relations between Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores and RMSD were investigated by Ordinal Logistic Regression (OLR). Goodness-of-fit of the OLR was obtained with Hosmer–Lemeshow test.ResultsThe HMSEN based method can precisely detect the SRO, and the RMSD scores and the MAS scores were fairly well related (test: χ2 = 8.8060, p = 0.2669; retest: χ2 = 1.9094, p = 0.9647). The prediction accuracies were 85% (test) and 77% (retest) when using RMSD for predicting MAS scores. In addition, the test–retest reliability was high, with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.914 and a standard error of measurement of 1.137. Bland–Altman plots also indicated a small bias.ConclusionsThe proposed method is manually operated and easy to use, and the HMSEN based method is robust in detecting SRO in clinical settings. Hence, the method is applicable to clinical practice. The RMSD can assess spasticity in a quantitative way and provide greater resolution of spasticity levels compared to the MAS in clinical settings. These results demonstrate that the proposed method could be clinically more useful for the accurate and reliable assessment of spasticity and may be an alternative clinical measure to the MAS.

An Accurate Method to Distinguish Between Stationary Human and Dog Targets Under Through-Wall Condition Using UWB Radar

“…dt [24]. The comparison results of Hilbert marginal spectrum of human targets and dog targets are demonstrated in Figure 7.…”

Predicting Remaining Useful Life Based on Hilbert–Huang Entropy with Degradation Model

“…Let S i (y) be a cubic polynomial on each of the intervals [y(i), y(i + 1)] so that we have n different polynomials of this type in total. According to the definition of the cubic spline interpolation, S i (y) can be represented by the following form [46,53,54]:…”

Correction to: Spasticity assessment based on the Hilbert–Huang transform marginal spectrum entropy and the root mean square of surface electromyography signals: a preliminary study

“…After the publication of the original article work [ 1 ], it was highlighted that the circuit information and the A/D converter used for acquiring sEMG signal were not correctly reported in “Methods” section. The circuit included a 10 Hz high-pass filter instead of 10 Hz notch filter as stated in the original article.…”