2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial analyses of emerging and fading wind energy landscapes in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research and practical experience provide clear evidence that the impact of RES on the landscape is an important acceptance factor [21]. Additionally to RES, potential negative impact on the landscape of powerlines is also perceived [22].…”
Section: Renewable Energy Community Immersion Domementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research and practical experience provide clear evidence that the impact of RES on the landscape is an important acceptance factor [21]. Additionally to RES, potential negative impact on the landscape of powerlines is also perceived [22].…”
Section: Renewable Energy Community Immersion Domementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor was the abolishment in 2000 of the fixed feed-in tariff which guaranteed price certainty for energy producers. Today, the Danish government policy is oriented towards the development of large scale offshore projects (Möller, 2010).…”
Section:  Anaerobic Digestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main reasons for the high acceptance at both national and local scale was ownership. Danish legislation has favored the 590 KARYDIS formation of local wind energy cooperatives characterized by limited ownership of shares in wind farms (Moller, 2010). This way a wide spread of ownership was established, providing income at a local level.…”
Section: Public Attitudes and Public Participation: Controversies Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But more than any ecological impact the public is opposed to wind farms for aesthetic reasons. In Denmark high pressure for higher visibility on landscapes was a reason why wind power projects failed; the EIA became mandatory since 90s for groups of three turbines and more (Moller, 2010). Two factors have been identified as the main keys for wind farm installations (a) the distance from the site: as a rule people living near the wind farm are opposed more actively than people living further away and (b) People matter: the social, economic and demographic profile of people near the wind farm plays a major role about their attitudes towards the development (Van der Horst and Toke, 2010).…”
Section: Landscape: Aesthetic and Scepticismmentioning
confidence: 99%