2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Analysis of Slowly Oscillating Electric Activity in the Gut of Mice Using Low Impedance Arrayed Microelectrodes

Abstract: Smooth and elaborate gut motility is based on cellular cooperation, including smooth muscle, enteric neurons and special interstitial cells acting as pacemaker cells. Therefore, spatial characterization of electric activity in tissues containing these electric excitable cells is required for a precise understanding of gut motility. Furthermore, tools to evaluate spatial electric activity in a small area would be useful for the investigation of model animals. We thus employed a microelectrode array (MEA) system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To generate pseudocolour images, the eld potential data were thinned 100-1000-fold in the time domain and bandpass ltered at 0.25-30 Hz (Kaiseki Excel add-in software, Kyowa, Tokyo, Japan). At certain recording times, the 8×8 eld potentials were interpolated by a spline function with 50 points between each potential using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) 53 . To reconstitute smooth potential images, the amplitude of the eld potential in each ME was compensated by the linear spectrum at 0.1-15 Hz 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To generate pseudocolour images, the eld potential data were thinned 100-1000-fold in the time domain and bandpass ltered at 0.25-30 Hz (Kaiseki Excel add-in software, Kyowa, Tokyo, Japan). At certain recording times, the 8×8 eld potentials were interpolated by a spline function with 50 points between each potential using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) 53 . To reconstitute smooth potential images, the amplitude of the eld potential in each ME was compensated by the linear spectrum at 0.1-15 Hz 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each recording electrode was a square (~50 μm × 50 μm) made from platinum black nanoparticles, which increased the surface area by ~200-fold to 0.5 mm 2 . The capacitance (CME) and resistance (RME) of each microelectrode was 0.052 μF and 15 kΩ, respectively 51,53 , hence the impedance of the recording electrode at 0.1 Hz was estimated to be small enough [~31 MΩ = √ {1/(2π × 0.1 Hz × 0.052 μF) 2 + (15 kΩ) 2 }] to follow oscillating potentials when compared to the input impedance of the multi-channel ampli er (100 MΩ at 0.1 Hz). The e cacy of electrical signal transmission (Tr) was estimated to be ~95% at 0.1 Hz [100 MΩ / √ {(100 MΩ) 2 + (31 MΩ) 2 }].…”
Section: Colonic Electrical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A,B). From the capacitance ( C ME : 0.052 μF) and resistance ( R ME : 15 kΩ) of the sensing microelectrode, the estimated impedance was sufficiently low to follow a wide frequency range of electric signals (Taniguchi et al 2013; Iwata et al 2017). For instance, the impedance ( Z ME ) of the sensing electrode at 0.1 Hz [∼31 MΩ = √ {1/(2π × 0.1 Hz × 0.052 μF) 2 + (15 kΩ) 2 }] was sufficiently small compared with the input resistance of the multi-channel amplifier used in this study (100 MΩ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each recording electrode was a square (~50 μm × 50 μm) made from platinum black nanoparticles, which increased the surface area by ~200-fold to 0.5 mm 2 . The capacitance (CME) and resistance (RME) of each microelectrode was 0.052 μF and 15 kΩ, respectively 51,53 , hence the impedance of the recording electrode at 0. Comparisons (vs. JF1 mice) were made using the log-rank test.…”
Section: Colonic Electrical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%