Spatial and Landscape Planning

Haaren, Christina von; Albert, Christian; Galler, Carolin

doi:10.4324/9781315775302-51

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At European level, the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) is a prominent process to capture the value of ecosystems . At local-to-regional level, numerous advances to operationalise ES into everyday decision-making, e.g., in forestry (Locatelli et al 2015), agriculture (Loucougaray et al 2015), management of recreational parks , wetland restoration (Liski et al In press), management of mountain landscapes and concepts for the integration of ES into formal planning processes (Haaren et al 2016) were discussed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sociocultural valuation (SCV) of ecosystem services (ES) discloses the principles, importance or preferences expressed by people towards nature. Although ES research has increasingly addressed sociocultural values in past years, little effort has been made to systematically review the components of sociocultural valuation applications for different decision contexts (i.e. awareness raising, accounting, priority setting, litigation and instrument design). In this analysis, we investigate the characteristics of 48 different sociocultural valuation applications-characterised by unique combinations of decision context, methods, data collection formats and participants-across ten European case studies. Our findings show that raising awareness for the sociocultural value of ES by capturing people's perspective and establishing the status quo, was found the most frequent decision context in case studies, followed by priority setting and instrument development. Accounting and litigation issues were not addressed in any of the applications. We reveal that applications for particular decision contexts are methodologically similar, and that decision contexts determine the choice of methods, data collection formats and participants involved. Therefore, we conclude that understanding the decision context is a critical first step to designing and carrying out fit-for-purpose sociocultural valuation of ES in operational ecosystem management.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This proposal of integrating sense of place into landscape planning draws on the general planning process outlined by von Haaren et al (2008). It had been further developed to integrate the ecosystem services concept (von Haaren et al, 2016). This is used as a blueprint for proposing the integration of sense of place.…”

Section: Integrating Sense Of Place Into Landscape Planning-a Concept...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Landscape plans and decisions affect the immediate living environment of citizens (Fischer-Gäde, 2016), making public participation useful and important at various stages of the planning process (von Haaren et al, 2008). Participatory planning, especially at an early stage, arguably increases democratic awareness and social responsibility of involved citizens, enhances trust building, identification with the living environment, reduces conflicts, increases support for planning proposals and facilitates social learning (Beierle, 2002;Fischer-Gäde, 2016;Müller et al, 2017;Reed, 2008;De Vente et al, 2016).…”

Section: Integrating Sense Of Place Into Landscape Planning-a Concept...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the integration of sense of place into spatial planning practice and theory has been shown to fall short (Manzo & Perkins, 2006;Ryan, 2011). Research and practice on social-ecological systems in general, and landscape planning in particular, focus on biophysical and intersubjective values rather than attempting to consider individual, subjective perceptions (Carvalho Ribeiro et al, 2019;Stedman, 2016;von Haaren et al, 2008). Further, the lack of conceptual and methodological clarity (Hernándes et al, 2014) and guidance for the understanding, assessment, and integration of sense of place poses challenges for planners and decision makers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating sense of place into participatory landscape planning: merging mapping surveys and geodesign workshops

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

show abstract

“…Ecosystems and related water allocation issues often transgress national boundaries. To overcome normative issues across boundaries, the assessment applies a globally equal basis for sound management of water resources (Schlattmann et al 2021 ) and evidence-based decision-making (Opdam et al 2002 ; von Haaren et al 2008 ). Sustainability, in this study is inspired by the definition given in the Brundtland Report (1987): “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution for the Maintenance of Ecosystems, their Services and Biodiversity

Schlattmann

Neuendorf

Burkhard

et al. 2022

Environmental Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Water provision and distribution are subject to conflicts between users worldwide, with agriculture as a major driver of discords. Water sensitive ecosystems and their services are often impaired by man-made water shortage. Nevertheless, they are not sufficiently included in sustainability or risk assessments and neglected when it comes to distribution of available water resources. The herein presented contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals Clean Water and Sanitation (SDG 6) and Life on Land (SDG 15) is the Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water distribution (ESAW-tool). The ESAW-tool introduces a watershed sustainability assessment that evaluates the sustainability of the water supply-demand ratio on basin level, where domestic water use and the water requirements of ecosystems are considered as most important water users. An ecological risk assessment estimates potential impacts of agricultural depletion of renewable water resources on (ground)water-dependent ecosystems. The ESAW-tool works in standard GIS applications and is applicable in basins worldwide with a set of broadly available input data. The ESAW-tool is tested in the Danube river basin through combination of high-resolution hydro-agroecological model data (hydrological land surface process model PROMET and groundwater model OpenGeoSys) and further freely available data (water use, biodiversity and wetlands maps). Based on the results, measures for more sustainable water management can be deduced, such as increase of rainfed agriculture near vulnerable ecosystems or change of certain crops. The tool can support decision making of authorities from local to national level as well as private enterprises who want to improve the sustainability of their supply chains.

show abstract

Spatial and Landscape Planning

Cited by 11 publications

References 1 publication

Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe

Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe

Integrating sense of place into participatory landscape planning: merging mapping surveys and geodesign workshops

Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution for the Maintenance of Ecosystems, their Services and Biodiversity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About