2024
DOI: 10.1155/2024/7261324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Changes in Taenia solium Cysticercosis Seroprevalence among Pigs in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania

Mwemezi L. Kabululu,
Bamidele N. Ogunro,
Helena A. Ngowi

Abstract: Taenia solium remains among the major causes of epilepsy in sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding the geospatial distribution of the parasite is important to inform control strategies. This study assessed spatiotemporal changes in the T. solium infection among pigs from a rural area in southwestern Tanzania. Secondary data from a previous repeated cross-sectional study in the Mbeya and Mbozi districts were used, involving sixteen villages, eight from each of the two districts. Serum samples were collected from 482… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The community risk factors are related to the number of people housed with infection, which is two communities with more infections (Harsha and Diyomat than the one with the availability of a clean and safe water supply (Maghang Juu). This is also supported by other studies on the clustering of infections for targeted control [37]. These risk factors are in line with similar endemic communities reported in other studies [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The community risk factors are related to the number of people housed with infection, which is two communities with more infections (Harsha and Diyomat than the one with the availability of a clean and safe water supply (Maghang Juu). This is also supported by other studies on the clustering of infections for targeted control [37]. These risk factors are in line with similar endemic communities reported in other studies [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%