2015
DOI: 10.1038/nature16183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal distribution of mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet since AD 1900

Abstract: The response of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS) to changes in temperature during the twentieth century remains contentious, largely owing to difficulties in estimating the spatial and temporal distribution of ice mass changes before 1992, when Greenland-wide observations first became available. The only previous estimates of change during the twentieth century are based on empirical modelling and energy balance modelling. Consequently, no observation-based estimates of the contribution from the GIS to the global… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
300
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
7
300
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Observation-based estimates and reanalysis-based estimates of Greenland SMB indicate a contribution of Greenland SMB to global sea level change of up to 25 6 9 mm and 10 6 4 mm, respectively (Kjeldsen et al 2015; Part I), which is significantly larger than the estimate based on extended historical simulations from climate models. The reason for the difference with observations is likely internal variability leading to more warming around Greenland in 1920-50 that is not present in the CMIP5 model historical simulations (Church et al 2013a; Part I).…”
Section: B Contribution From the Greenland Ice Sheet Smbmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Observation-based estimates and reanalysis-based estimates of Greenland SMB indicate a contribution of Greenland SMB to global sea level change of up to 25 6 9 mm and 10 6 4 mm, respectively (Kjeldsen et al 2015; Part I), which is significantly larger than the estimate based on extended historical simulations from climate models. The reason for the difference with observations is likely internal variability leading to more warming around Greenland in 1920-50 that is not present in the CMIP5 model historical simulations (Church et al 2013a; Part I).…”
Section: B Contribution From the Greenland Ice Sheet Smbmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Greenland ice sheet contribution to sea level is estimated using the recent mass balance estimate from ref. 19. The Antarctic ice sheet is modeled with the RACMO2.3 model (40), as in ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To produce homogeneous synthetic fields of historical sea level fields, we combine historical fields of sea surface height from CMIP5 models and the SODA reanalysis over the period from 1871 to 2005 with independent estimates of glacier melting (18). Also added are the observation-based estimates of the ice sheets (19,20) and TWS containing both groundwater depletion (21) and water impoundment behind dams (22). For the simulation of ocean dynamics, sea surface height fields (variable "zos" in CMIP5 terminology) are obtained from the historical simulations of 11 CMIP5 models (see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations