2012
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal dust source variability in northern China identified using advanced remote sensing analysis

Abstract: The aim of this research is to provide a detailed characterization of spatial patterns and temporal trends in the regional and local dust source areas within the desert of the Alashan Prefecture (Inner Mongolia, China). This problem was approached through multi‐scale remote sensing analysis of vegetation changes. The primary requirements for this regional analysis are high spatial and spectral resolution data, accurate spectral calibration and good temporal resolution with a suitable temporal baseline. Landsat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamics of mineral dust emission are fundamentally controlled by a combination of the power of the wind to erode (erosivity) and the resistance of an emitting surface to erosion (erodibility; Webb & Strong, ). Interactions between erosive and resisting forces are complex and result in dust emission being spatially and temporally highly heterogeneous (e.g., Bryant et al, ; Gillette, ; Gillies, ; Mahowald et al, ; Taramelli et al, ). Improvements in dust emission modeling remains an important contemporary research goal since existing models have a limited capacity to accurately account for the spatiotemporal variability of dust emission within dust sources (Haustein et al, ; Parajuli et al, ; Shao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of mineral dust emission are fundamentally controlled by a combination of the power of the wind to erode (erosivity) and the resistance of an emitting surface to erosion (erodibility; Webb & Strong, ). Interactions between erosive and resisting forces are complex and result in dust emission being spatially and temporally highly heterogeneous (e.g., Bryant et al, ; Gillette, ; Gillies, ; Mahowald et al, ; Taramelli et al, ). Improvements in dust emission modeling remains an important contemporary research goal since existing models have a limited capacity to accurately account for the spatiotemporal variability of dust emission within dust sources (Haustein et al, ; Parajuli et al, ; Shao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Taramelli et al . (). Potential dust‐emitting pixels were identified using a combination of global digital datasets along with remote sensed and field validation analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Second, as highlighted by the fine spatial structure of potential dust sources validated with the remote sensing analysis presented in Taramelli et al . (), dust emission and consequent transport can not be resolved by coarse resolution global atmospheric models: this reduces the overall reliability of represented dust storm dynamics and, in particular, the critical wind speed at the surface for dust emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every pixel in the image was assigned to a certain class using a threshold value in fractional cover (i.e., ≥ 0.5552 for the wet class; ≥ 0.5950 for the soil class; ≥ 0.4992 for P. australis ; ≥ 0.5507 for E. athericus ; and ≥ 0.8945 for pioneer vegetation). The LiDAR elevation ranges for each vegetation type, which were obtained from the RWS vegetation map, were used to determine the vegetation class for the pixels where the threshold was not reached and, therefore, could not be classified (Taramelli & Melelli, ; Taramelli, Pasqui, et al, ). These pixels were classified by performing principal component analysis between the three fraction maps and the elevation value of the LiDAR survey provided by RWS based on information on the distribution of vegetation classes in the LIDAR‐elevation range value (Hladik et al, ; Taramelli, Valentini, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%