2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Evaluation of Radar Rainfall Nowcasting Techniques on 1,533 Events

Abstract: Radar rainfall nowcasting, the process of statistically extrapolating the most recent rainfall observation, is increasingly used for very short range rainfall forecasting (less than 6 hr ahead). We performed a large‐sample analysis of 1,533 events, systematically selected for 4 event durations and 12 lowland catchments (6.5–957 km2), to determine the predictive skill of nowcasting. Four algorithms are tested and compared with Eulerian Persistence: Rainymotion Sparse, Rainymotion DenseRotation, Pysteps determin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use a single case study to compare the nowcasting performance of the generative method DGMR to three strong baselines: PySTEPS, a widely used precipitation nowcasting system based on ensembles, considered to be state-of-the-art 3,4,13 ; UNet, a popular deep learning method for nowcasting 15 ; and an axial attention model, a radar-only implementation of MetNet 19 . For a meteorologically challenging event, Figs.…”
Section: Intercomparison Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use a single case study to compare the nowcasting performance of the generative method DGMR to three strong baselines: PySTEPS, a widely used precipitation nowcasting system based on ensembles, considered to be state-of-the-art 3,4,13 ; UNet, a popular deep learning method for nowcasting 15 ; and an axial attention model, a radar-only implementation of MetNet 19 . For a meteorologically challenging event, Figs.…”
Section: Intercomparison Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, motion fields are estimated by optical flow, smoothness penalties are used to approximate an advection forecast, and stochastic perturbations are added to the motion field and intensity model 3,4,12 . These stochastic simulations allow for ensemble nowcasts from which both probabilistic and deterministic forecasts can be derived and are applicable and consistent at multiple spatial scales, from the kilometre scale to the size of a catchment area 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a modular nowcasting framework and is based on S‐PROG (Seed, 2003) and STEPS (Bowler et al, 2006; Seed et al, 2013). We used the same pySTEPS setup as Imhoff et al (2020): the Lucas‐Kanade optical flow method (Lucas & Kanade, 1981) using the QPE from t −3 to t , a backward semi‐Lagrangian advection method (Germann & Zawadzki, 2002), and the STEPS nowcasting procedure with a nonparametric noise method (Bowler et al, 2006; Seed et al, 2013). See Imhoff et al (2020) for the performance of this setup under different circumstances for a large sample of rainfall events in the Netherlands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, more studies are required to assess the performance of GPM IMERG against other satellite and reanalysis products to find the advantages and limitations of the GPM satellite. Furthermore, other precipitation specific properties such as spatial and temporal heterogeneity, spatial and temporal intermittence, extreme variability and multi-fractal comparisons is necessary to overcome substantial uncertainties rainfall estimations [57][58][59]. Cristiano et al [60] also depicted in their review that the rainfall variability may need wider range of conditions and scenario based in observational datasets for urban hydrological basins, which need proper analysis for development of better hydrological response system with higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Future Studies and Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%