2016
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Evaluation of Hydrological Response to Climate and Land Use Change in Three South Dakota Watersheds

Abstract: This study analyzed changes in hydrology between two recent decades (1980s and 2010s) with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in three representative watersheds in South Dakota: Bad River, Skunk Creek, and Upper Big Sioux River watersheds. Two SWAT models were created over two discrete time periods (1981‐1990 and 2005‐2014) for each watershed. National Land Cover Datasets 1992 and 2011 were, respectively, ingested into 1981‐1990 and 2005‐2014 models, along with corresponding weather data, to enable comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Upper Wabash model that uses SWAT's weather generator (WGN; Table ) to obtain energy‐related weather inputs shows relatively poor fit scores for streamflow, even though the model is calibrated at multiple sites (Figure ). Relying on WGN generally yields reasonable outputs where required data are discontinuous or sparsely available (Alighalehbabakhani et al, ; Evenson et al, ; Paul et al, ; Price et al, ). Accordingly, the WGN‐based model for Upper Wabash, despite underperforming with R 2 = 0.56 and NSE = 0.5 in daily streamflow simulation, can be vetted acceptable based on the criteria suggested by SWAT developers (e.g., Moriasi et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Upper Wabash model that uses SWAT's weather generator (WGN; Table ) to obtain energy‐related weather inputs shows relatively poor fit scores for streamflow, even though the model is calibrated at multiple sites (Figure ). Relying on WGN generally yields reasonable outputs where required data are discontinuous or sparsely available (Alighalehbabakhani et al, ; Evenson et al, ; Paul et al, ; Price et al, ). Accordingly, the WGN‐based model for Upper Wabash, despite underperforming with R 2 = 0.56 and NSE = 0.5 in daily streamflow simulation, can be vetted acceptable based on the criteria suggested by SWAT developers (e.g., Moriasi et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are discontinuous or sparsely available (Alighalehbabakhani et al, 2017;Evenson et al, 2016;Paul et al, 2017;Price et al, 2014). Accordingly, the WGN-based model for Upper Wabash, despite underperforming with R 2 = 0.56 and NSE = 0.5 in daily streamflow simulation, can be vetted acceptable based on the criteria suggested by SWAT developers (e.g., Moriasi et al, 2015).…”
Section: 1029/2017wr021147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining land uses are water and wetlands (7%), urban (6.5%), and other land uses (0.35%) as shown in Figure b. Between 1992 and 2001, grassland conversion to cropland in the watershed was estimated to be 3% (Paul et al, ; Rajib et al, ). Skunk Creek is a main tributary to the Big Sioux River, which is a tributary of the Missouri River.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, there is a need to explicitly examine the influence of grassland–cropland conversion on river flow regimes in order to provide insight that can be useful for formulation of watershed management strategies in the Upper Great Plains. Skunk Creek watershed in Eastern South Dakota is a representative catchment of the Upper Great Plains that undergoes rapid reduction of grassland due to increased cultivated crop production (e.g., Paul, Rajib, & Ahiablame, ; Reitsma et al, ; Wimberly et al, ). The main objective of this study was to approximate changes in annual flow regime as a result of grassland conversion to cultivated cropland in Skunk Creek watershed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this featured series is to demonstrate the versatility of SWAT in addressing traditional hydrologic problems such as Best Management Practices (BMP) implementation, land use/ climate change impacts, model/data uncertainty, and emerging issues such as the impact of natural gas development and bio-cropping scenarios on hydrology. In this issue, the use of SWAT to assess the role of climate and land use changes on hydrology of three South Dakota watersheds is presented (Paul et al, 2016). The study by Radcliffe and Mukundan (2016) demonstrates the role of precipitation data quality on SWAT model calibration and validation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%