2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal extents of natural disturbances differentiate deadwood-inhabiting fungal communities in spruce primary forest ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a study relating disturbance histories with the data on occurrence of one species, Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), a significant relationship was found (Mikoláš et al 2017). The relationships between disturbance history variables and organism assemblages were found in other taxonomic groups such as fungi (Ferenčík et al 2022), lichens (Langbehn et al 2021) and saproxylic beetles (Kozák et al 2020). In our case this relationship was probably distorted by the high mobility of birds and by the impact of recent disturbances which occurred in approximately the last 20 years, which are not detectable by our methods.…”
Section: Bird Assemblages In Beech and Spruce-dominated Primary Forestsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in a study relating disturbance histories with the data on occurrence of one species, Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), a significant relationship was found (Mikoláš et al 2017). The relationships between disturbance history variables and organism assemblages were found in other taxonomic groups such as fungi (Ferenčík et al 2022), lichens (Langbehn et al 2021) and saproxylic beetles (Kozák et al 2020). In our case this relationship was probably distorted by the high mobility of birds and by the impact of recent disturbances which occurred in approximately the last 20 years, which are not detectable by our methods.…”
Section: Bird Assemblages In Beech and Spruce-dominated Primary Forestsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there is emerging evidence that medium-to high-severity and scale disturbances were also historically a part of BDPF disturbance regimes, although to a much lower extent than in SDPF (Frankovič et al 2021). The diversity of disturbance regimes has differing effects on forest structure, which thereby has divergent effects on habitat availability for different taxonomic groups of species, thereby altering biological assemblages (Kozák et al 2020;Langbehn et al 2021;Ferenčík et al 2022). Therefore, disentangling the impacts of disturbances across different forest types is crucial in these times of rapid biodiversity decline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also new approaches to forest management after natural disturbances as a part of natural ecosystem dynamics [94,[272][273][274][275] aimed at increasing biodiversity both in nature conservation (Western Carpathians [91,276,277]) and closer-to-nature forestry (Western Carpathians [278]; Eastern Carpathians [279]). Recommendations to leave postdisturbance withdrawn stands go hand in hand with some evidence of the low impact of sanitary felling on bark beetle spread [280,281].…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%