2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal land use change and occupation over the last half century in a peri-urban area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…4). This growing process is in good agreement with previous findings of other authors (Marques et al, 2014;Meneses et al, 2014;Oliveira et al, 2017;Tavares et al, 2012). Moreover, the present study con- .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…4). This growing process is in good agreement with previous findings of other authors (Marques et al, 2014;Meneses et al, 2014;Oliveira et al, 2017;Tavares et al, 2012). Moreover, the present study con- .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Among other applications, such methodology has been applied to explore the impacts of land use on regional water balance and revegetation strategies (Versace et al, 2008); to assess landscape dynamism to be considered in models of LULC change (Lira et al, 2012); to link patterns to processes of LULC changes based on levels of intensity analysis (Huang et al, 2012); and to detect the dynamic linkage between landscape characteristics and water quality evaluating the statistical relationship between landscape metrics and physical-chemical parameters (Huang et al, 2013). It has also been used to provide a set of pressures on biodiversity derived from LULC changes covering a metropolitan area in Chile (Rojas et al, 2013) and for a spatial-temporal land use change analysis in a peri-urban area within the same river basin used as a case study in this paper (Tavares et al, 2012). Yet, as far as we know, it has never been used as a tool to explicitly identify and quantify drivers of environmental change linked both to LULC and LULC change with potential effects on the condition of water bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods allowed us to determine the landscape changes and to detect pressures acting upon some areas included in the PNA during the last decades (urban and transport infrastructures development, etc). We reviewed i) previous studies focused on photo-interpretation techniques [30][31][32][33][34]; ii) land uses changes and territorial dynamics in different environmental conditions [35][36][37][38][39][40] and iii) definition of land uses categories [41][42][43][44]. We chose two working scales: the first analyzed the variability of the PNA as a whole (1:50,000), and the second, that use a more detail scale, permited us to recognize different ecological processes that occurred in the territory (1:12,500).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%