2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal occurrence of preferential flow in a forested headwater catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
122
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
122
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the measurement uncertainty of the installed SWC sensors (4-5 vol %; [37]) the RMSE of 3.4 to 5.3 vol % appear very low and are within the range of other HYDRUS-1D studies on the Wüstebach test site [50,53]. The varying soil hydraulic properties among plots and layers (Table 2) fit well to the observations of [36,38]. The low K s value in the riparian zone is plausible, because the soils in the valley bottom have a higher bulk density and a lower macro-porosity than the soils on the hillslopes [37,38].…”
Section: Soil Moisture Simulationssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the measurement uncertainty of the installed SWC sensors (4-5 vol %; [37]) the RMSE of 3.4 to 5.3 vol % appear very low and are within the range of other HYDRUS-1D studies on the Wüstebach test site [50,53]. The varying soil hydraulic properties among plots and layers (Table 2) fit well to the observations of [36,38]. The low K s value in the riparian zone is plausible, because the soils in the valley bottom have a higher bulk density and a lower macro-porosity than the soils on the hillslopes [37,38].…”
Section: Soil Moisture Simulationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The varying soil hydraulic properties among plots and layers (Table 2) fit well to the observations of [36,38]. The low K s value in the riparian zone is plausible, because the soils in the valley bottom have a higher bulk density and a lower macro-porosity than the soils on the hillslopes [37,38].…”
Section: Soil Moisture Simulationssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil types can be subdivided into terrestrial soils (i.e., Cambisols, Planosols) and semi-terrestrial soils (i.e., Gleysols, Histosols) in the ripar- ian zone (Gottselig et al, 2017). The mean porosity of the soils varied from 20 to 81 % for groundwater influenced soils and from 60 to 78 % for the terrestrial soils with decreasing values with increasing depth (Wiekenkamp et al, 2016). In the riparian zone, the water table varied between 0.0 and 1.6 m, while it constantly remained below the soil-bedrock interface outside of the riparian zone .…”
Section: The Forested Wüstebach Catchment (Ger)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the poor accuracy for surface soil moisture simulation may be caused by the unusual weather conditions in 2012. In addition, the uncertainties of input data and field measurements such as groundwater table [58], the possible preferential flow [59] and even the observation errors might also bring adverse influences on the accuracy of the simulations for all four stages. …”
Section: Performance Of the Wfsp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%