Spatial and temporal patterns of intertidal macrobenthic populations in the Oosterschelde: are they influenced by the construction of the storm-surge barrier?

Abstract

The construction of a storm-surge barrier in the mouth of the Oosterschelde caused important hydrodynamical and morphological changes that could influence the macrobenthic populations . This paper is one in a series of five all dealing with the effects of the storm-surge barrier on macrozoobenthos and analyses the spatial and temporal distribution of macrozoobenthos in the Oosterschelde and its relationship with some environmental parameters, based on two large scale sampling campaigns, one before and one after the completion of the barrier .The sediment of the sampling stations was fine, well sorted sand, with an average mud content of about 2.5 % . Only in the Krabbenkreek the sediment was coarser in 1989 . The tidal elevation of the sampling sites decreased significantly in 1989 .The density of macrozoobenthos was significantly lower, the biomass higher in 1989. The density was dominated by deposit feeders, the biomass by filter feeders . The difference in biomass between both years was mainly due to a substantial increase of the biomass of filter feeders in 1989 . The number of species per station was significantly smaller in 1989 than in 1985 . Between 1985 and 1989, frequency of occurrence decreased in 34 versus 13 which increased, density increased in 13 species and decreased in 34 species, biomass increased in 18 species and decreased in 29 species .Based on TWINSPAN several clusters of stations, each with a different faunal composition, were identified . These clusters did not form distinct zones on the tidal flats but were dispersed widely .The relationship between density and biomass of different trophic groups and the mud content of the sediment and the depth was analysed . This relationship sometimes differed clearly between years . The correlation coefficient of a multiple regression between density and biomass of individual species and environmental factors, although significant in most cases, was very low, indicating that only a small proportion of the species variability was explained . The relationship between benthos and environmental factors was further analysed by canonical correlation analysis and multivariate discriminant analysis that gave different results for the 1985 and 1989 data . This is probably due to the broad tolerance of the species to the range of the environmental variables found in our study area . From a TWINSPAN of the density data. of 1985 and 1989 together we could conclude that, although the environmental parameters in a group of stations, showing a large faunal similarity in one year, did not change, the faunal composi-157 1 5 8 tion did . This indicates that faunal changes are not necessarily linked to changes in the measured environmental parameters .In the discussion the different factors affecting macrobenthic populations are situated and it is suggested that the macrobenthic populations are probably more towards the nonequilibrium end of the continuum between nonequilibrium and equilibrium communities as defined by Wiens (1984) .Although the impact of the construct...

Macrobenthic species response surfaces along estuarine gradients: prediction by logistic regression

“…The importance of hydrodynamic variables such as current velocity, bed shear stress and wind-wave activity have also been recognised as influencing larval settlement and post-settlement transport (Grant 1983, Butman 1987, Commito et al 1995, availability of particulate food resources (Miller et al 1992, Wildish & Kristmanson 1997 and the stability of the substratum (Warwick et al 1991, Grant et al 1997. At the local (smaller) spatial scale, sediment composition has been shown to influence estuarine benthic assemblage structure and species distribution (Gray 1974, Beukema 1976, Junoy & Viétez 1990, Warwick et al 1991, Meire et al 1994). These abiotic environmental variables (salinity, depth, maximum ebb-and flood-current velocities, median grain size and mud content) were used to statistically model and predict, through logistic regression, the distribution (presence/absence) of individual estuarine macrobenthic species at the estuarine macro-and meso-scale.…”

Long-term trends in juvenile flatfish indicate a dramatic reduction in nursery function of the Balgzand intertidal, Dutch Wadden Sea

“…Predator-prey interactions in intertidal systems are complex (Freitas et al 2008). Among the infauna, some polychaete worms are dominant opportunistic consumers, preying on other worms and crustaceans (Meire et al 1994). Wading birds prey on a wide range of benthic organisms, especially bivalves and polychaetes, and thus their food supply is restricted by aspects such as accessibility (depth), digestibility (size) and profitability (energy content) (Zwarts et al 1992).…”

Habitat change in estuaries: predicting broad-scale responses of intertidal macrofauna to sediment mud content

“…Broad-scale differences in assemblages in sand and mud habitats are readily apparent (e.g. Gray 1974, Beukema 1976, Zajac & Whitlatch 1982, Meire et al 1994, Mannino & Montagna 1997, Ysebaert et al 2002. However, when relationships between sediment characteristics and the distribution and abundance of macrofauna have been identified, elucidating the underlying mechanisms has proved elusive (Butman 1987, Snelgrove & Butman 1994.…”