2008
DOI: 10.1575/1912/2564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal population genetics at deep-sea hydrothermal vents along the East Pacific Rise and Galapagos Rift

Abstract: Ecological processes at deep-sea hydrothermal vents on fast-spreading mid-ocean ridges are punctuated by frequent physical disturbance. Larval dispersal among disjunct vent sites facilitates the persistence of sessile invertebrate species in these geologically and chemically dynamic habitats despite local extinction events. Regional population extension and rapid recolonization by the siboglinid tubeworm Riftia pachyptila have been well documented along the East Pacific Rise and the Galápagos Rift. To analyze … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Clipperton Fracture Zone forms an east–west offset near 10°N on the otherwise linear ridge, separating these areas (Figure 1). Intraspecific genetic differences in vent taxa from north and south of the fracture zone, including annelids and molluscs, have been sought using allozymes (see review by Jollivet, 1996), DNA sequence data (Won et al , 2003; Hurtado et al , 2004; Matabos et al , 2008) and even microsatellite data (Fusaro, 2008); no significant within-species differences have been detected. Despite the morphological differences reported here, considering these specimens to be conspecific is conservative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clipperton Fracture Zone forms an east–west offset near 10°N on the otherwise linear ridge, separating these areas (Figure 1). Intraspecific genetic differences in vent taxa from north and south of the fracture zone, including annelids and molluscs, have been sought using allozymes (see review by Jollivet, 1996), DNA sequence data (Won et al , 2003; Hurtado et al , 2004; Matabos et al , 2008) and even microsatellite data (Fusaro, 2008); no significant within-species differences have been detected. Despite the morphological differences reported here, considering these specimens to be conspecific is conservative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%