2012
DOI: 10.3390/f3041133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Responses to an Emissions Trading Scheme Covering Agriculture and Forestry: Simulation Results from New Zealand

Abstract: Abstract:We perform simulations using the integrated Land Use in Rural New Zealand (LURNZ) model to analyze the effect of various New Zealand emissions trading scheme (ETS) scenarios on land use, emissions and output in a temporally and spatially explicit manner. We compare the impact of afforestation to the impact of other land-use change on net greenhouse gas emissions and evaluate the importance of the forestry component of the ETS relative to the agricultural component. We find that the effect of including… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to partition the country into biomes approximating the five categories available in Biome-BGC and then mask and sum the NEP contributions from each biome, we produced a land-cover and land-use (LCLU) map. The LCLU map uses 10 categories based on a combination of the land-cover database (LCDB) for New Zealand (Shepherd and Newsome, 2009;Dymond et al, 2012) and the Land-Use in Rural New Zealand (LURNZ) model (Hendy et al, 2007;Timar, 2011;Kerr et al, 2012). The New Zealand LCDB is a thematic classification of land-cover and land-use categories, created using satellite imagery and covering all of mainland New Zealand.…”
Section: Terrestrialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to partition the country into biomes approximating the five categories available in Biome-BGC and then mask and sum the NEP contributions from each biome, we produced a land-cover and land-use (LCLU) map. The LCLU map uses 10 categories based on a combination of the land-cover database (LCDB) for New Zealand (Shepherd and Newsome, 2009;Dymond et al, 2012) and the Land-Use in Rural New Zealand (LURNZ) model (Hendy et al, 2007;Timar, 2011;Kerr et al, 2012). The New Zealand LCDB is a thematic classification of land-cover and land-use categories, created using satellite imagery and covering all of mainland New Zealand.…”
Section: Terrestrialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis, the total amount of forest land is exogenous, and we only consider the allocation of this land between production and permanent forests. Focussing on the decision to convert production forests into permanent forests at harvesting age is supported by the research by Kerr et al (2012), which found that the change in land use from other types of agriculture into forestry as incentivised by the carbon price is negligible. Additionally, if any land use change occurs between production and permanent forests at afforestation, it will not affect the creation of carbon permits for 23 years due to the crossover between stocktake and averaging accounting.…”
Section: The Forestry Model: Energy and Emissions In New Zealand (Enz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that less productive forestry regions are the most efficient land areas to transition to permanent forests when the carbon price increases. Kerr et al (2012) estimated the expected land use change elasticities between different agricultural land uses. They found a relatively low level of land use change to forestry from agriculture under the NZ ETS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LURNZ model (Hendy et al, 2007Timar, 2011;Kerr et al, 2012) was developed to explain and simulate changes in four major rural land-use types in New Zealand: dairy, sheep and beef, plantation forestry and regenerating natural forest (henceforth termed scrubland). LURNZ models land use both dynamically, based on national time-series econometric estimates of land-use change, and spatially, based on crosssectional observations of biophysical and socio-economic land attributes.…”
Section: Lurnz Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%