2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal scales of chlorophyll variability using high-resolution glider data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…variation is never negligibly small, and even when the mixed layer is deepest and the turbulence is strongest, it doesn't drop below about 0.5. As expected, the variability is larger during the Austral summer months, when turbulence is weaker than in other seasons, showing an extended peak from spring to autumn, in full agreement with the variability observed through autonomous observations in the SAZ (Little et al, 2018). In the Eulerian simulation, and in Lagrangian simulations with very strong irreversible mixing, the peak is small and occurs in December, when the mixed layer is the shallowest, while the coefficient of variation remains negligibly different from zero in other months.…”
Section: Comparison With Bgc-argo Float Observationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…variation is never negligibly small, and even when the mixed layer is deepest and the turbulence is strongest, it doesn't drop below about 0.5. As expected, the variability is larger during the Austral summer months, when turbulence is weaker than in other seasons, showing an extended peak from spring to autumn, in full agreement with the variability observed through autonomous observations in the SAZ (Little et al, 2018). In the Eulerian simulation, and in Lagrangian simulations with very strong irreversible mixing, the peak is small and occurs in December, when the mixed layer is the shallowest, while the coefficient of variation remains negligibly different from zero in other months.…”
Section: Comparison With Bgc-argo Float Observationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Chlorophyll fluctuations are damped, but not completely wiped out. The resolution length scale of observations affects variance estimations, as found when highfrequency sampling instruments are used (Little et al, 2018). In Figure 7B ( Figure S3B for PAPA) we show the monthly average of the coefficient of variation of the simulation data relative to p = 10 −7 , after they underwent this coarse-graining procedure at several resolutions.…”
Section: Comparison With Bgc-argo Float Observationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A SAZ glider study by Little et al (2018) corroborated these findings with summer matchups in small-scale temporal variability (<10 days) in wind stress, mixed-layer depth (MLD) and chlorophyll that emphasizes the interconnectedness between physical drivers and their biological response. Despite the similarity in the scales of variability, no correlation was observed between MLD and Chl a, which is explained by the variable response that MLD adjustments drive, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The euphotic depth was defined as the depth at which the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is 1% of surface PAR. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) analysis was performed on glider data according to the methods outlined in Little et al (2018). Briefly, primary signals from glider sea surface temperature (SST), MLD, surface chlorophyll concentration and α NPQ were decomposed into Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) (Rato et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%