1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf03161335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal variability of trophic relationships among aquatic macroinvertebrates in a seasonal marsh

Abstract: We examined macroinvertebrate trophic relationships in stands of two emergent plants, pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and alkali bulrush (Scirpus robustus), and in epiphytic and benthic habitats within pickleweed stands. Numbers of detritivores, predators, and herbivores were examined throughout the flooding season (October 1990-March 1991. Trophic structure of macroinvertebrate communities differed between epiphytic and benthic habitats; both herbivores and detritivores were abundant in epiphytic habitats, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larvae and adults of those taxa consuming different types of food during their life cycle were considered separately, and those taxa feeding on more than one food source were allocated in relation to their dominant type of food source (see de Szalay & Resh, 1996). The taxa were discarded when no information on their feeding ecology was available.…”
Section: Metric Selection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larvae and adults of those taxa consuming different types of food during their life cycle were considered separately, and those taxa feeding on more than one food source were allocated in relation to their dominant type of food source (see de Szalay & Resh, 1996). The taxa were discarded when no information on their feeding ecology was available.…”
Section: Metric Selection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquatic vegetation influences life-history dynamics of aquatic macroinvertebrates by affecting colonization (de Szalay & Resh, 2000), distribution (Beckett et al, 1992;Waters & San Giovanni, 2002), predation (Crowder & Cooper, 1982;Schramm & Jirka, 1989b;Batzer & Resh, 1991;Zimmer et al, 2000), food availability (Nelson et al, 1990;Campeau et al, 1994;Kornijow et al, 1995), and trophic relationships (de Szalay & Resh, 1996). As aquatic macrophytes vary spatially and temporally, the aquatic macroinvertebrate species that inhabit these vegetative environments may likewise vary (Schramm et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial diVerences in community composition can inXuence community succession and determine the outcomes of disturbance (de Szalay and Resh 1996), intraguild predation (Price and Morin 2004), and competitive interactions (Underwood and Anderson 1994;Nandakumar 1996) on the resulting assemblages. This experiment was motivated by observations of macrophyte beds in the Macquarie River, a slow-Xowing, lowland river in Tasmania, Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%