2019
DOI: 10.3101/1098-7096-79.1.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Variation in the Diet of the Eastern Red Bat in Kentucky

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With DNA-based analysis of trophic interactions, it is well known that differences in how well prey can be detected from fecal samples will bias results toward the prey that is detectable the longest (Greenstone et al, 2014). However, despite that a multitude of studies that have been using DNA-based methods to assess the dynamics between bats and their prey (e.g., Aizpurua et al, 2018;Gordon et al, 2019;Hayes et al, 2019;Mata et al, 2016;Weier et al, 2019), the severity of such biases has not been investigated. To bridge this knowledge gap, we here show how the post-feeding prey DNA detection interval depends on a range of interacting factors such as the species of prey, the mass of prey that was consumed, and the species of bat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With DNA-based analysis of trophic interactions, it is well known that differences in how well prey can be detected from fecal samples will bias results toward the prey that is detectable the longest (Greenstone et al, 2014). However, despite that a multitude of studies that have been using DNA-based methods to assess the dynamics between bats and their prey (e.g., Aizpurua et al, 2018;Gordon et al, 2019;Hayes et al, 2019;Mata et al, 2016;Weier et al, 2019), the severity of such biases has not been investigated. To bridge this knowledge gap, we here show how the post-feeding prey DNA detection interval depends on a range of interacting factors such as the species of prey, the mass of prey that was consumed, and the species of bat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of such molecular methods is that they increase the likelihood that so far overlooked or rare taxa are detected (e.g., Clare, 2014;Razgour et al, 2011;Vesterinen et al, 2013) by enabling the identification of prey that are strongly digested or the identification of soft-bodied prey and insect larvae (Clare et al, 2009;Razgour et al, 2011). Furthermore, targeting the DNA of prey increases the likelihood of attaining a highly resolved taxonomic description of a bat's diet (Clare et al, 2011;Gordon et al, 2019;Sousa et al, 2019;Vesterinen et al, 2018), given the availability of reference sequences, whereas morphological methods usually only allow prey identity to be resolved the family or order level (Ashrafi et al, 2011;Hayes et al, 2019;Krüger et al, 2012;Pereira et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They forage in various forest habitats (Elmore et al., 2005), often focusing their foraging behavior along linear features within the forest matrix, such as ridgetops and roads (Amelon et al., 2014; Beilke et al., 2023). They consume a wide variety of insects, though moths and beetles may be favored prey items (Clare et al., 2009; Hayes et al., 2019; Whitaker, 2004). The species engages in partial seasonal migration, wherein some individuals travel north in the spring and south in the fall (Cryan, 2003; True et al., 2023; Wieringa et al., 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consume a wide variety of insects, though moths and beetles may be favored prey items (Clare et al, 2009;Hayes et al, 2019;Whitaker, 2004). The species engages in partial seasonal migration, wherein some individuals travel north in the spring and south in the fall (Cryan, 2003;True et al, 2023;Wieringa et al, 2021).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%