2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal variations in meteoric 10Be inventories and long-term deposition rates, Colorado Front Range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate JatmBe10 (equation (1)), the basin‐wide meteoric 10 Be depositional flux FmetBe10 needs to be known. FmetBe10 can be obtained by several methods, including long‐term meteoric 10 Be inventories measured in independently dated soils (Ouimet et al, 2015), short‐term measurements of 10 Be in precipitation (Graly et al, 2011), or atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) for global meteoric 10 Be deposition (Willenbring & von Blanckenburg, 2010). In the study area, no 10 Be flux data are reported by the first two methods, and thus, we adopted the third one, which has previously been applied to large catchments (Rahaman et al, 2017; Wittmann et al, 2015) and very small catchments (<1 km 2 ) (Dannhaus et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate JatmBe10 (equation (1)), the basin‐wide meteoric 10 Be depositional flux FmetBe10 needs to be known. FmetBe10 can be obtained by several methods, including long‐term meteoric 10 Be inventories measured in independently dated soils (Ouimet et al, 2015), short‐term measurements of 10 Be in precipitation (Graly et al, 2011), or atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) for global meteoric 10 Be deposition (Willenbring & von Blanckenburg, 2010). In the study area, no 10 Be flux data are reported by the first two methods, and thus, we adopted the third one, which has previously been applied to large catchments (Rahaman et al, 2017; Wittmann et al, 2015) and very small catchments (<1 km 2 ) (Dannhaus et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate cannot be reliably obtained from short-term precipitation records (Graly et al, 2011), but rather from meteoric 10 Be soil inventories of known age or erosion (e.g. Egli et al (2010); Ouimet et al (2015); Willenbring and von Blanckenburg (2010)), or time-averaged global circulation models. Here, we use a F of 1.4610 6 ats cm -2 y -1 derived from a combination of a model for the simulation of cosmic ray particle interactions with the Earth's atmosphere (Masarik and Beer, 1999) with the "ECHAM5" fifth-generation global atmospheric circulation model (GCM) coupled to the aerosol model HAM (Heikkilä et al, 2013a;Heikkilä et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Requirements For the Successful Application Of The New Proxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heikkilä et al (2013)) that also incorporates a 889 physical model simulating processes of cosmic particle production and transport 890 (Masarik and Beer, 1999) and variations in solar modulation and magnetic field 891 strength. For smaller scales, measured inventories 10 Be in soil for given latitudes and 892 precipitation rates can be used to determine local 893 Willenbring and von Blanckenburg, 2010;Graly et al, 2011;Ouimet et al, 2015). As 894 >95% of meteoric 10 Be production in the atmosphere takes place at elevations above 895 3 km altitude, scaling for altitude is not required for most locations (Willenbring and 896 von Blanckenburg, 2010).…”
Section: General Principles 857mentioning
confidence: 99%