2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-012-9278-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Aspects of the Rise of Nonmarital Fertility Across Europe Since 1960: The Role of States and Regions in Shaping Patterns of Change

Abstract: This paper investigates the role of states and regions in shaping spatial patterns of nonmarital fertility in Europe since 1960 using a dataset of 497 European subnational regions and smaller countries. Almost all regions registered substantial nonmarital fertility increases over the last 50 years. Prior research by Watkins (1991) has shown that in the first half of the 20 th century states played a dominant role in drawing the demographic map of Europe. As a result, subnational regional variation decreased, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Vital statistics are still largely computed following the traditional distinction between marital and nonmarital fertility  historically, legitimate and illegitimate fertility , not acknowledging the social phenomenon of unmarried cohabitation. For this reason, fertility estimates for cohabitation based on vital statistics are a rarity; when available, they are limited to the number or proportion of children born to cohabiting women (Klüsener, Perelli-Harris, and Sánchez Gassen 2013). There is no established way to compare the fertility of marriage and cohabitation.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vital statistics are still largely computed following the traditional distinction between marital and nonmarital fertility  historically, legitimate and illegitimate fertility , not acknowledging the social phenomenon of unmarried cohabitation. For this reason, fertility estimates for cohabitation based on vital statistics are a rarity; when available, they are limited to the number or proportion of children born to cohabiting women (Klüsener, Perelli-Harris, and Sánchez Gassen 2013). There is no established way to compare the fertility of marriage and cohabitation.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billy and Moore 1992 ;Bocquet-Appel and Jakobi 1998 ;Boyle 2014 ;Klüsener et al 2013 ;Vitali et al 2015 ) but may be attributable to the lack of data and limited access. Surveys' microdata have become the primary statistical source for family studies.…”
Section: The Motivation For a Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vital statistics are still largely computed following the traditional distinction between marital and non-marital fertility, and thus have not usually incorporated the social phenomenon of cohabitation into the birth statistics. For this reason, it is hard to find fertility estimates by union type based on vital statistics (Klüsener, Perelli-Harris, and Sánchez Gassen 2013). Attempts at estimating fertility within marriage and within consensual union performed since the 1990s show a variety of solutions, but most of them rely on the use of survey data with retrospective histories (e.g.…”
Section: Measuring Fertility Within Marriage and Within Consensual Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%