2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial-based skin detection using discriminative skin-presence features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining textural features with spatial analysis was also the key contribution of our recent work [9]. We introduced the DSPF space, which is exploited to compute the local costs for DT, instead of using the skin probability map as in [59].…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining textural features with spatial analysis was also the key contribution of our recent work [9]. We introduced the DSPF space, which is exploited to compute the local costs for DT, instead of using the skin probability map as in [59].…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the local model is applied to locate the seeds for spatial analysis, which determines the final boundaries of the skin regions. We perform the spatial analysis using the discriminative skin-presence features (DSPF), introduced in our earlier work [9], that rely on textural properties of skin probability maps.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of methods for skin detection and segmentation proposed [19][20][21] that are based on skin color modeling [18], supported with the analysis of the texture [22] as well as spatial distribution of skin pixels [44]. Also, adapting the skin model [21,62] to a presented scene increases the precision of segmenting skin regions.…”
Section: Gesture Recognition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every image in the set presents a singlehand gesture, and the ground-truth data encompass the SPM and locations of 25 landmarks. Our data sets (HGR1 and HGR2) contain images acquired with controlled and uncontrolled background, which makes skin segmentation challenging [21,22]. In the database, we provide ground-truth SPMs-this makes it possible to validate skin segmentation algorithms, and also enables evaluating hand shape recognition [36] as well as landmark detection and localization relying on the ground-truth data, so as to prevent error propagation.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This step is undertaken if the shape features are to be extracted from the skin map of I i . There exist a number of robust skin detection and segmentation techniques [15][16][17][18][19]. A thorough survey on current state-of-the-art skin detection approaches has been published recently [20].…”
Section: Parallel Hand Shape Classification Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%