2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999gb900043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial budget of organic carbon flux to the seafloor of the northern North Atlantic (60°N–80°N)

Abstract: The transfer of organic carbon from surface waters to the seafloor was calculated for the northern North Atlantic east of Greenland. This calculation is based on an empirically derived relationship between the rain rate of remineralizable organic carbon, derived by in situ O2 profiles, water depth, and primary production. The reliability of this attempt is supported by the good correspondence of calculated rain rates with an independent data set of particle trap studies and shipboard measurements of O2 profile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(36 reference statements)
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalent of 16.7 mmol organic carbon m À2 , either in the form of diatoms or faecal pellets, was gently pipetted onto the surface of the experimental sediments (n ¼ 6 in both cases). This represents B10% of the annual carbon flux in this region (Schlü ter et al, 2000). Treatments were randomized across corer deployments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent of 16.7 mmol organic carbon m À2 , either in the form of diatoms or faecal pellets, was gently pipetted onto the surface of the experimental sediments (n ¼ 6 in both cases). This represents B10% of the annual carbon flux in this region (Schlü ter et al, 2000). Treatments were randomized across corer deployments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CWCR habitats cover ∼1671 km 2 of the Norwegian continental shelf (150.000 km 2 , Fossa et al, 2002), while recent ROV observations suggest at least a similar coverage for sponges (Cruise report, R/V Håkon Mosby-cruise #2009615). Using these estimates of seafloor coverage, CWCR and sponge grounds are jointly responsible for 36% of the total benthic respiration on the Norwegian continental shelf, and process 5% of the total primary production in the area (Schluter et al, 2000). Conventional carbon budgets typically only account for soft-sediment respiration and hence, these budgets may significantly underestimate total seafloor carbon cycling and the intensity of the benthicpelagic coupling on continental shelves with coral and sponge reefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Based on (Klitgaard and Tendal, 2004), we assumed a similar coverage for sponges than for corals. c From (Schluter et al, 2000;Huthnance, 2010). (Rovelli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observations of surface primary production and chlorophyll concentration as well as particle flux to the deep sea reveal a series of complex, overlapping processes. Nutrient availability, plankton community, food web structure and the hydrodynamic regime have an impact on particle export efficiency [Antia et al, 2001;Bory et al, 2001;Doval et al, 2001;Fischer et al, 2000;Jahnke, 1996;Lutz et al, 2002;Martin et al, 1987;Neuer et al, 2002;Sauter et al, 2001;Schlüter et al, 2000]. There have been several attempts to find relations between sea surface parameters and sediment trap fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%