1993
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90148-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial but not object recognition is impaired by aging in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
46
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, deficits were observed in tasks that demanded memory for the relative recency ("working memory") of one of two levers (Dunnett et al 1988), light intensities (Winocur 1991 ) or conditional cue locations (Winocur 1992). In contrast, delay-dependent postacquisition performance was not impaired in tasks that employed nonrepeating (Aggleton et al 1989;Cavoy and Delacour 1993) or seldom-repeating (this study) discrete stimuli. The only exception to this characterization of the combined results is the absence of a delay-dependent deficit for spatial cues in the Aggleton et al (1989) study.…”
Section: Age-related Selective Impairment On Cdnm Acquistioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, deficits were observed in tasks that demanded memory for the relative recency ("working memory") of one of two levers (Dunnett et al 1988), light intensities (Winocur 1991 ) or conditional cue locations (Winocur 1992). In contrast, delay-dependent postacquisition performance was not impaired in tasks that employed nonrepeating (Aggleton et al 1989;Cavoy and Delacour 1993) or seldom-repeating (this study) discrete stimuli. The only exception to this characterization of the combined results is the absence of a delay-dependent deficit for spatial cues in the Aggleton et al (1989) study.…”
Section: Age-related Selective Impairment On Cdnm Acquistioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…For example, in the Cavoy and Delacour (1993) study, in contrast to the sparing of delayed object recognition, the same aged subjects were severely impaired in delayed (90 sec) recognition of an arm in a spatial maze. Also, Dunnett et al (1988) reported that 15-and 24-month-old rats had a delay-dependent deficit in matching and nonmatching to sample in a task where rats had to remember which of two retractable levers was presented: In this study aged animals were not impaired during initial acquisition of the task when no delay was imposed between the sample and match stimulus presentations.…”
Section: Age-related Selective Impairment On Cdnm Acquistionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is agreement on the age-related retention deficits with delays .24 h (Bartolini et al 1996;de Lima et al 2005;Pieta Dias et al 2007; Burke et al 2010;Leite et al 2011), but not at short retention intervals. Although some investigators found no age-related impairment in SOR memory testing at 1-min (Lukaszewska and Radulska 1994), 2-min (Burke et al 2010), 3-min (Bergado et al 2011), 5-min (Cavoy and Delacour 1993), and 1.5-h delays (de Lima et al 2005;Pieta Dias et al 2007; Leite et al 2011), there are studies reporting deficits in aged rats at 2 h (Burke et al 2010), 1 h (Scali et al 1994Vannucchi et al 1997;Pitsikas et al 2005; Da Silva Costa-Aze et al 2011) and even at 60-or 30-sec retention periods (Willig et al 1987;Bartolini et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Experiment 1 we used standard objects that differed in material, shape, size, and color. Aging studies using SOR tasks have applied a great variety of standard objects (Aggleton et al 1989;Lukaszewska and Radulska 1994;Liu et al 2004;Hauser et al 2009), since the use of clearly different elemental stimuli is common (Cavoy and Delacour 1993;Burke et al 2010;Bergado et al 2011). However, they are often poorly described and not easily found all over the world, rendering it difficult to replicate the experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%