2020
DOI: 10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial changes in the command and control function of cities based on the corporate centre of gravity model

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss changes in the spatial distribution of cities that perform the command and control function created by the largest corporations, based on the method of gravity centres. The analysis was performed both for individual sectors of the economy as well as for the global scale. A shift occurred in an easterly direction. This also pertains to sector indices, although the centroids of knowledge-based sectors, such as information technology and healthcare, shifted the most in the dire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…NEG has been criticized because distance is pre‐given exogenously and time is “logical” time rather than real history (Boschma & Frenken, 2006; Garretsen & Martin, 2010; Martin, 1999). In this study, the profit center of gravity is the spatial equilibrium point of industrial competition, and the distance from the spatial equilibrium point is endogenously determined rather than pre‐given exogenously (Grether & Mathys, 2010; Lösch, 1967; Raniak et al., 2020). As the spatiotemporal content of industrial competition changes, the profit center of gravity also moves, and the average distance between the sample companies and the profit center of gravity changes simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NEG has been criticized because distance is pre‐given exogenously and time is “logical” time rather than real history (Boschma & Frenken, 2006; Garretsen & Martin, 2010; Martin, 1999). In this study, the profit center of gravity is the spatial equilibrium point of industrial competition, and the distance from the spatial equilibrium point is endogenously determined rather than pre‐given exogenously (Grether & Mathys, 2010; Lösch, 1967; Raniak et al., 2020). As the spatiotemporal content of industrial competition changes, the profit center of gravity also moves, and the average distance between the sample companies and the profit center of gravity changes simultaneously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium point becomes the center of gravity in flat spaces such as polygons (Kulin & Kuenne, 1962), hexagons (Lösch, 1967), circles (Hayashi & Tsuge, 2019), and ellipses (Gong, 2002). In empirical research, the center of gravity is regarded as a point of spatial equilibrium, such as the economic center of gravity (Grether & Mathys, 2010), the industrial center of gravity (Raniak et al., 2020), the population center of gravity (Luo et al., 2019), and so on. However, the relationship between the profit center of gravity and firm performance is still in a “black box.”…”
Section: Literature Review Theory and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The least degraded Subcarpathian and Masovian Provinces only have about one quarter of this share. Nevertheless, there are many companies that play a significant role in central and eastern Europe [99]; however, apart from Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa, they are not important in the global economy [100].…”
Section: Research Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chinese cities have been playing an increasingly important role in the world city networks, and they have improved their international connectivity and workers' skills as well [61]. Moreover, these Chinese cities also exhibit their great resilience or sustainability in the global economic crisis [62,63].…”
Section: Data Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%