Spatial compatibility and affordance compatibility in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Kume, Yu; Sato, Fumiyasu; Hiraoka, Yuya; Suzuki, Shingo; Niyama, Yoshitsugu

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.002

Asian Journal of Psychiatry

2016

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.002

|View full text |Cite

Spatial compatibility and affordance compatibility in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Yu Kume

Fumiyasu Sato²,

Yuya Hiraoka³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2017

2019

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, this finding is currently offered as “textbook” knowledge supporting the association hypothesis (Sinnett, Smilek, & Kingstone, 2016, p. 252). Further, the SRC paradigm has been coopted to investigate the relationship of perception and action in psychological disorders (e.g., schizophrenia; Kume, Sato, Hiraoka, Suzuki, & Niyama, 2016), demonstrating its continued influence across wide domains in psychology. In Tucker and Ellis (1998), participants were shown images of tools with their handles oriented toward the left or the right.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.

Matheson¹,

Thompson-Schill²

2019

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brain imaging research shows that viewing tools activates regions of the cortex implicated in performing actions with that tool. Grounded (or embodied) theories of cognition propose that this activity reflects the activation of motor representations that are constitutive of the object concept. Behaviorally, participants respond faster with the hand that is aligned with the handle of an object. This stimulus–response compatibility (SRC) effect is often taken as evidence supporting the hypothesis that motor representations are activated in response to the visual presentation of tools during conceptual processing. To test this hypothesis, we trained participants to use a set of novel tools (manipulation group) or to report spatial information about the tools (spatial group) in preparation for a Martian archeological dig. We investigated compatibility effects in a conceptual judgment task and a visual discrimination task. Compatibility effects were observed for both groups regardless of experience. These effects were predicted by the salient parts of objects specified by task demands and not by motor experience with the objects. This result provides evidence that compatibility effects with tools reflect a general stimulus–response compatibly effect due to visual attention.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.

Matheson¹,

Thompson-Schill²

2019

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Spatial compatibility and affordance compatibility in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Cited by 3 publications

References 39 publications

Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.

Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.

Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?

A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About