2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02562563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial competition among clonal organisms in extant and selected paleozoic reef communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, careful and detailed study of the early post-larval skeletal mass of a hypercalciWed sponge is important in making a correct interpretation. Commonly this is diYcult, if not impossible, in fossil forms, but closely spaced serial sections may provide additional insight (Fagerstrom et al 2000). It should also be noted that viable interpretation of fusion and Wssion in extant hypercalciWed sponges is also diYcult because virtually nothing is known of their reproductive history and early growth (number of propagules, etc.)…”
Section: Spongesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, careful and detailed study of the early post-larval skeletal mass of a hypercalciWed sponge is important in making a correct interpretation. Commonly this is diYcult, if not impossible, in fossil forms, but closely spaced serial sections may provide additional insight (Fagerstrom et al 2000). It should also be noted that viable interpretation of fusion and Wssion in extant hypercalciWed sponges is also diYcult because virtually nothing is known of their reproductive history and early growth (number of propagules, etc.)…”
Section: Spongesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until these edges actually fuse, this situation might be viewed as Wssion or spatial competition (i.e., stand-oV) even when the point of origin of the clone is clearly observed. In some live-live competitive stand-oV interactions, the clonal margins maintain a, more or less, constant distance between them (Fagerstrom et al 2000).…”
Section: Types Of Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12); (2) self-overgrowth (Lee and Noble 1990, fig. 1; Kidwell and Gyllenhaal 1998;Fagerstrom et al 2000); (3) fusion of juxtaposed clones (Figs. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8); and (4) quasi-fusion of poorly organized, dense masses of stems in dendroidal algae, sponges (Fig.…”
Section: Biotic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies of live-live interactions in reef communities have emphasized heterospecific spatial competition (Lang 1971(Lang , 1973Jackson 1977;Buss 1986;Lang and Chornesky 1990;McKinney 1992;Fagerstrom et al 2000;Taylor and Wilson 2003). Among live reef-building Table 1 Annual percentages of live substrate cover (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponge assemblages are influenced by a number of physical factors including: depth [43][44][45]; water flow [44,46]; temperature [26,47]; light intensity [48]; sedimentation [49][50][51][52] and salinity [26,53,54]. Biological factors influencing sponge assemblages include: predation [55][56][57][58]; mutualistic and symbiotic associations [59][60][61]; concentration and plankton diversity [62][63][64]; spatial competition [65][66][67]; and disease [68][69][70][71]. There has been some discussion regarding the relative roles of biological and physical factors in controlling sponge assemblages in different geographic regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%